* [Buildroot] installing binaries
@ 2009-07-29 1:33 Igor Serebryany
2009-08-04 14:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Igor Serebryany @ 2009-07-29 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi,
I've been having a hard time figuring out how buildroot decides to
install binaries. Using 2009.02 or 2009.05, I often find that the
binaries for the packages I've selected do not make it into
project_build_ARCH/myproject/root
Is there a way to tell buildroot to go through every selected
package and copy the binaries to the image? Even if I have to delete
some target file in each folder, it would be better then the other
two alternatives I've come up with:
1) copying all the binaries to the root by hand
2) modifying the prefix in the Makefiles for all packages and doing
'make install' for each one individually
I think I get all the packages if I make distclean and then make,
but many packages fail to compile the first time (like util-linux
which always requires a lot of hacking) and I hate to loose my
modifications via make distclean
Trying 'make clean' is futile, as most packages fail to clean and
make clean always errors out half-way through.
I've been working on this for a few days now, so I appreciate any
tips...
--Igor
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20090728/b78dac9c/attachment.pgp>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] installing binaries
2009-07-29 1:33 [Buildroot] installing binaries Igor Serebryany
@ 2009-08-04 14:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2009-08-04 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello Igor,
Le Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:33:05 -0500,
Igor Serebryany <igor47@moomers.org> a ?crit :
> I've been having a hard time figuring out how buildroot
> decides to install binaries. Using 2009.02 or 2009.05, I often find
> that the binaries for the packages I've selected do not make it into
> project_build_ARCH/myproject/root
Basically, the decision is package dependent. But we have roughly two
types of packages :
* Packages based on the Makefile.autotools.in infrastructure. In that
case, the installation to the target space
(project_build_ARCH/PROJECT/root) is done if FOO_INSTALL_TARGET is
YES (which is the default), and if the
project_build_ARCH/PROJECT/autotools-stamps/PKG_NAME_target_installed
stamp file does not exist. See package/Makefile.autotools.in for the
details ;
* Packages *not* based on the Makefile.autotools.in. In that case, the
install is usually implement with a make target that is a file
installed in the target directory. For example, for the flex
package, it is $(TARGET_DIR)/$(FLEX_TARGET_BINARY). Therefore,
removing this file from the target directory will trigger the
re-execution of the make install of that particular package.
> Is there a way to tell buildroot to go through every selected
> package and copy the binaries to the image?
Theorically, removing the target directory completely + removing the
*_target_installed stamp files from
project_build_ARCH/PROJECT/autotools-stamps/ should make it. But I
don't guarantee that it will work for every package.
> I think I get all the packages if I make distclean and then
> make, but many packages fail to compile the first time (like
> util-linux which always requires a lot of hacking) and I hate to
> loose my modifications via make distclean
If they are issues in building util-linux, please don't hesitate to
report them so that we can fix them.
> Trying 'make clean' is futile, as most packages fail to clean
> and make clean always errors out half-way through.
Yes.
> I've been working on this for a few days now, so I appreciate
> any tips...
I gave you the tips that I have. Buildroot is definitely not good
(yet!) on cleaning up things and handling partial rebuilds. This is
definitely on my TODO-list, and I think that Peter is also very
concerned about these issues.
Hope this helps,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development,
consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20090804/473e5dc7/attachment.pgp>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-04 14:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-29 1:33 [Buildroot] installing binaries Igor Serebryany
2009-08-04 14:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox