From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit master] buildroot; move defconfigs to configs/ and print in help
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:03:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091111150359.579df608@surf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873a5y5nbq.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
Hello,
Coming back on this old topic, because I really don't like the new way.
Le Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:09:29 +0200,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> a ?crit :
> True - This change makes it slightly harder for developers, but easier
> for users to find (and for us to do a test build of all defconfigs
> prior to release).
For developers, it's a mess. You have to explain to developers that
they have to put some stuff in this directory, some other stuff into
this directory. (BTW the documentation at
http://buildroot.org/buildroot.html#board_support hasn't been updated
accordingly).
Moreover, it breaks the idea of having out-of-tree board support.
Before this change, it was relatively easy since the stuff needed to
support one board was centralized in one directory (see my proposal at
http://git.buildroot.net/~tpetazzoni/git/buildroot/commit/?id=ed47f42a598c665bf42c4e797187f233b955e285).
Now, it's split between a directory in target/device and a file in
configs/.
To make them more visible to users, I suggest to reorganize target/. All
board-stuff should be moved to a top-level boards/ directory. This
directory would have roughly the same architecture as the current
target/device/ directory.
And then, to make the defconfig files visible to users, just show them
in "make help".
> The stuff in target/device/ tends to get stale over time, so a bit
> more visibility is imho good.
Let's move it to boards/ then.
> I obviously like it, and I never had any comments when I proposed it
> back in September:
>
> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2009-September/029269.html
True, I forgot to send my comments at that time. Or maybe didn't
realized what the impact of the change would be.
Is it possible to re-discuss this topic before the 2008.11 release ?
Sincerly,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development,
consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-04 20:20 [Buildroot] [git commit master] buildroot; move defconfigs to configs/ and print in help Peter Korsgaard
2009-10-05 6:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-10-05 7:09 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-11-11 14:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2009-11-11 18:36 ` Thiago A. Corrêa
2009-11-22 21:05 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-11-25 22:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-11-25 22:16 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091111150359.579df608@surf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox