Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] skeleton: add default login port to /etc/securetty
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 01:08:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120715010848.0290501a@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5001E2B2.6070509@mind.be>

Le Sat, 14 Jul 2012 23:20:50 +0200,
Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> a ?crit :

>   I wouldn't like that.  I often use the default skeleton but override e.g.
> inittab in the post-build script.  I can't be bothered with setting
> BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_GETTY_PORT to empty.  So the result is
> that a /etc/securetty would be created which bears no relation with
> the actual login ports defined in inittab...  And all this happens on the
> sly, without any consent from the user or warning in the config menus.
> 
>   Bottom line: automatically adding BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_GETTY_PORT
> to securetty is OK for me, but emptying it is not.

Hmm, ok. But if you're modifying the inittab through a post-build
script, we could also say that it's your responsibility to also
adjust /etc/securetty accordingly, no?

I don't have a strong opinion here, just trying to find the right
balance.

>   BTW I can't think of many circumstances where securetty makes sense
> on an embedded system to begin with: why would you allow shell login
> on some port but not root login?

Is removing /etc/securetty sufficient? Both for Busybox getty, the
full-featured getty, and things like dropbear, openssh, telnet and al?
I think telnet needs pts/[0-n] to be in /etc/securetty otherwise it
doesn't allow root login.

Regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-14 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-13  3:19 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] skeleton: add default login port to /etc/securetty roylee17 at gmail.com
2012-07-14 16:56 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-07-14 17:15   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-14 21:20     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-07-14 23:08       ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2012-07-15  0:28         ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-07-30 15:13           ` Tzu-Jung Lee
2013-05-26 20:14 ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-05-26 20:30   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-26 20:40   ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-05-26 20:43     ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-05-26 21:00     ` Peter Korsgaard
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-21  9:56 Tzu-Jung Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120715010848.0290501a@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox