* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] PAM support in Busybox if linux-pam is built
@ 2012-08-14 2:24 Dmitry
2012-08-14 2:24 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Provide PAM configuration files in the fs skeleton Dmitry
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry @ 2012-08-14 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Signed-off-by: Dmitry <golubovsky@gmail.com>
---
package/busybox/Config.in | 11 +++++++++++
package/busybox/busybox.mk | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/busybox/Config.in b/package/busybox/Config.in
index dedcf18..2a9cbf1 100644
--- a/package/busybox/Config.in
+++ b/package/busybox/Config.in
@@ -62,6 +62,17 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_WATCHDOG
Install the watchdog daemon startup script,
that just start at the boot the busybox watchdog daemon.
+config BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_PAM
+ bool "Enable PAM support in Busybox"
+ default n
+ depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LINUX_PAM
+ help
+ If this item is selected, Busybox login will use the PAM stack
+ for local logins. Local logins with null password are allowed
+ for users with records in /etc/passwd ("default" and "root").
+ The default PAM configuration file requires user accounts with
+ nonzero length passwords.
+
if BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_WATCHDOG
config BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_WATCHDOG_PERIOD
diff --git a/package/busybox/busybox.mk b/package/busybox/busybox.mk
index 17ee50a..c97ce77 100644
--- a/package/busybox/busybox.mk
+++ b/package/busybox/busybox.mk
@@ -161,6 +161,17 @@ define BUSYBOX_INSTALL_WATCHDOG_SCRIPT
endef
endif
+ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_PAM),y)
+BUSYBOX_DEPENDENCIES += linux-pam
+define BUSYBOX_ENABLE_PAM
+ $(call KCONFIG_ENABLE_OPT,CONFIG_PAM,$(BUSYBOX_BUILD_CONFIG))
+endef
+else
+define BUSYBOX_ENABLE_PAM
+ $(call KCONFIG_DISABLE_OPT,CONFIG_PAM,$(BUSYBOX_BUILD_CONFIG))
+endef
+endif
+
# We do this here to avoid busting a modified .config in configure
BUSYBOX_POST_EXTRACT_HOOKS += BUSYBOX_COPY_CONFIG
@@ -176,6 +187,7 @@ define BUSYBOX_CONFIGURE_CMDS
$(BUSYBOX_DISABLE_MMU_APPLETS)
$(BUSYBOX_SET_INIT)
$(BUSYBOX_SET_WATCHDOG)
+ $(BUSYBOX_ENABLE_PAM)
@yes "" | $(MAKE) ARCH=$(KERNEL_ARCH) CROSS_COMPILE="$(TARGET_CROSS)" \
-C $(@D) oldconfig
endef
--
1.7.2.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Provide PAM configuration files in the fs skeleton
2012-08-14 2:24 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] PAM support in Busybox if linux-pam is built Dmitry
@ 2012-08-14 2:24 ` Dmitry
2012-08-14 13:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry @ 2012-08-14 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
The default PAM configuration file requires valid user accounts with
non-blank passwords.
The PAM configuration file for busybox login allows local authentication
with blank passwords thus emulating the non-PAM login configuration.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry <golubovsky@gmail.com>
---
fs/skeleton/etc/pam.d/default | 8 ++++++++
fs/skeleton/etc/pam.d/login | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 fs/skeleton/etc/pam.d/default
create mode 100644 fs/skeleton/etc/pam.d/login
diff --git a/fs/skeleton/etc/pam.d/default b/fs/skeleton/etc/pam.d/default
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0bd5ba0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/skeleton/etc/pam.d/default
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#
+# default; standard UN*X access
+#
+auth required pam_unix.so
+account required pam_unix.so
+password required pam_unix.so
+session required pam_unix.so
+
diff --git a/fs/skeleton/etc/pam.d/login b/fs/skeleton/etc/pam.d/login
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d65a9d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/skeleton/etc/pam.d/login
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+#
+# login: allow local logins to users with entries in /etc/passwd and
+# /etc/shadow even with null password
+#
+auth required pam_unix.so nullok
+account required pam_unix.so nullok
+password required pam_unix.so nullok
+session required pam_unix.so nullok
+
--
1.7.2.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Provide PAM configuration files in the fs skeleton
2012-08-14 2:24 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Provide PAM configuration files in the fs skeleton Dmitry
@ 2012-08-14 13:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-08-14 13:50 ` Dmitry Golubovsky
2012-08-15 3:39 ` Dmitry Golubovsky
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2012-08-14 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Le Mon, 13 Aug 2012 22:24:49 -0400,
Dmitry <golubovsky@gmail.com> a ?crit :
> The default PAM configuration file requires valid user accounts with
> non-blank passwords.
>
> The PAM configuration file for busybox login allows local authentication
> with blank passwords thus emulating the non-PAM login configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry <golubovsky@gmail.com>
Thanks!
I'm not sure we want these in the default fs skeleton. Shouldn't the
linux-pam package install these instead?
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Provide PAM configuration files in the fs skeleton
2012-08-14 13:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2012-08-14 13:50 ` Dmitry Golubovsky
2012-08-15 3:39 ` Dmitry Golubovsky
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Golubovsky @ 2012-08-14 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> The PAM configuration file for busybox login allows local authentication
>> with blank passwords thus emulating the non-PAM login configuration.
>
> I'm not sure we want these in the default fs skeleton. Shouldn't the
> linux-pam package install these instead?
>
Well, I thought that such files (just like /etc/passwd) could be made static.
I can change this to make them installed by linux-pam itself.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry Golubovsky
Anywhere on the Web
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Provide PAM configuration files in the fs skeleton
2012-08-14 13:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-08-14 13:50 ` Dmitry Golubovsky
@ 2012-08-15 3:39 ` Dmitry Golubovsky
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Golubovsky @ 2012-08-15 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure we want these in the default fs skeleton. Shouldn't the
> linux-pam package install these instead?
>
I have resent the patch: now these PAM config files are part of the
linux-pam package files. The reason why they are copied in a
post-patch hook: $(RAWNAME) does not seem to be available inside
post-install hooks.
Hope this is an acceptable way to distribute non-patch files along
with package itself, or is there a better way?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry Golubovsky
Anywhere on the Web
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-15 3:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-14 2:24 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] PAM support in Busybox if linux-pam is built Dmitry
2012-08-14 2:24 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Provide PAM configuration files in the fs skeleton Dmitry
2012-08-14 13:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-08-14 13:50 ` Dmitry Golubovsky
2012-08-15 3:39 ` Dmitry Golubovsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox