Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Two or three stages gcc build?
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:58:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130906145821.4ce0ab13@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9C6FE6D2-322A-41E7-8B82-C623B5C1F754@gmail.com>

Dear Khem Raj,

On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 10:31:46 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:

> I am late in reply but here it is.

No problem. Thanks for your reply.


> > In fe9a576e8d27460468dfe5eac90aad49ab26a8d3 (gcc-cross-intermediate,
> > gcc-crosssdk-intermediate: Remove) you completely remove the
> > intermediate recipes, so I assume they are really no longer needed,
> > even by the uClibc build, since I believe OE-core also supports uClibc
> > builds (thanks to your work).
> 
> thats correct. See the code around where limits.h is installed by gcc initial
> uclibc was less of an issue, glibc was more until last year when a lot of cleanup
> was done especially where build time dependency on libgcc_s and libgcc_eh was averted
> in cross gcc and buildroot you can do the same like i have done for OE I can help out

In the mean time, I've experimented a bit and actually implemented it.
The patch hasn't been merged yet in Buildroot, but it has been posted:
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2013-September/077344.html.

Don't hesitate to have a look and tell me what you think.

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-06 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-05 21:38 [Buildroot] Two or three stages gcc build? Thomas Petazzoni
     [not found] ` <9C6FE6D2-322A-41E7-8B82-C623B5C1F754@gmail.com>
2013-09-06 12:58   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
     [not found]     ` <EEBE54E3-BD6F-4BB5-88C4-CB3B51CC1FCC@gmail.com>
2013-09-07  9:15       ` Thomas Petazzoni
     [not found]         ` <CAL4-wQrTouutDaj2zCVmCQH4+XpEJMR05_goC2KrcF2HgXotiA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-07 11:49           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-19  5:02       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-08 18:58         ` Thomas Petazzoni
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-19 17:02 soochon radee
2013-09-19 19:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130906145821.4ce0ab13@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox