From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Two or three stages gcc build?
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:58:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130906145821.4ce0ab13@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9C6FE6D2-322A-41E7-8B82-C623B5C1F754@gmail.com>
Dear Khem Raj,
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 10:31:46 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> I am late in reply but here it is.
No problem. Thanks for your reply.
> > In fe9a576e8d27460468dfe5eac90aad49ab26a8d3 (gcc-cross-intermediate,
> > gcc-crosssdk-intermediate: Remove) you completely remove the
> > intermediate recipes, so I assume they are really no longer needed,
> > even by the uClibc build, since I believe OE-core also supports uClibc
> > builds (thanks to your work).
>
> thats correct. See the code around where limits.h is installed by gcc initial
> uclibc was less of an issue, glibc was more until last year when a lot of cleanup
> was done especially where build time dependency on libgcc_s and libgcc_eh was averted
> in cross gcc and buildroot you can do the same like i have done for OE I can help out
In the mean time, I've experimented a bit and actually implemented it.
The patch hasn't been merged yet in Buildroot, but it has been posted:
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2013-September/077344.html.
Don't hesitate to have a look and tell me what you think.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-06 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-05 21:38 [Buildroot] Two or three stages gcc build? Thomas Petazzoni
[not found] ` <9C6FE6D2-322A-41E7-8B82-C623B5C1F754@gmail.com>
2013-09-06 12:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
[not found] ` <EEBE54E3-BD6F-4BB5-88C4-CB3B51CC1FCC@gmail.com>
2013-09-07 9:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni
[not found] ` <CAL4-wQrTouutDaj2zCVmCQH4+XpEJMR05_goC2KrcF2HgXotiA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-07 11:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-19 5:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-08 18:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-19 17:02 soochon radee
2013-09-19 19:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130906145821.4ce0ab13@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox