From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Two or three stages gcc build?
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:27:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130919212720.084654d0@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADXR8ejAOgcjrxoHM8obEL0vFSeJhgbDn46aBT6OPpkoOfc-DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dear soochon radee,
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:02:33 -0400, soochon radee wrote:
> I am also seeing the two-phase build break eglibc trying to link
> SSP-related symbols on 64-bit targets (powerpc/970, x86_64/core2) in
> libc/resolv. This happens even if SSP is enabled in .config
>
> I've been digging around gcc-initial's configure arguments and directories
> passed around to eglibc's configure script to no avail. But, I've been able
> to make it work by forcing eglibc to assume no SSP support with the
> following patch. Hopefully this will point a way to a better solution.
Well, I've been able to fix the problem on ARM by explicitly telling
gcc-initial that the libc *will* have SSP support. However, it doesn't
work on x86 because SSP requires TLS support, which isn't provided by
gcc-initial. I am not yet sure how to fix this (enable threads in
gcc-initial, if it is even possible? switch to a three stages build
when SSP is enabled?).
I'll continue experimenting around with this.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-19 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-19 17:02 [Buildroot] Two or three stages gcc build? soochon radee
2013-09-19 19:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-05 21:38 Thomas Petazzoni
[not found] ` <9C6FE6D2-322A-41E7-8B82-C623B5C1F754@gmail.com>
2013-09-06 12:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
[not found] ` <EEBE54E3-BD6F-4BB5-88C4-CB3B51CC1FCC@gmail.com>
2013-09-07 9:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni
[not found] ` <CAL4-wQrTouutDaj2zCVmCQH4+XpEJMR05_goC2KrcF2HgXotiA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-07 11:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-19 5:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-08 18:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130919212720.084654d0@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox