From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package: udev is now provided by systemd or eudev.
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:37:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130917203726.5b02fe08@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <522F8008.1000207@mind.be>
Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 22:24:40 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> > +comment "eudev requires /dev mgmnt set to udev under System configuration"
> > + depends on !BR2_ROOTFS_DEVICE_CREATION_DYNAMIC_UDEV
> > +
> > +comment "eudev not available with Systemd as init system"
> > + depends on BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD
>
> I think these comments are not really necessary. Actually, I would say
> that the only reason that eudev has a user-visible Config option is for
> the "enable all extras". And that config option is slightly redundant,
> since the additional size of gudev is almost nothing compared to
> libglib2, so you could just as well use an automatic dependency.
No, I disagree with this. There are some other packages (currently
udisks and network-manager) that explicitly need the udev extras. So I
believe it's useful for these packages to be able to 'select
BR2_PACKAGE_UDEV_ALL_EXTRAS'. Of course, they could 'select
BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGLIB2' and depend on udev, but this means that they have
internal knowledge of the fact that udev needs libglib2 to enable 'all
extras', an internal knowledge that could very well be broken if
tomorrow udev needs another dependency to build its 'all extras' things.
So, the BR2_PACKAGE_(E)UDEV_ALL_EXTRAS option should remain in place, I
believe.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-17 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-06 14:01 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package: udev is now provided by systemd or eudev eric.le.bihan.dev at free.fr
2013-09-06 14:08 ` Eric Le Bihan
2013-09-10 20:24 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-17 10:40 ` Eric Le Bihan
2013-09-18 4:45 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 6:52 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-17 18:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-09-18 6:57 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-18 15:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 16:04 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-18 16:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 21:46 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-17 5:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-17 12:53 ` Eric Le Bihan
2013-09-17 18:45 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 7:00 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-18 15:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 16:06 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-18 16:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 17:34 ` Sagaert Johan
2013-09-18 17:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 18:13 ` Sagaert Johan
2013-09-18 18:05 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package: udev is now provided bysystemd " Sagaert Johan
2013-09-18 18:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130917203726.5b02fe08@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox