From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package: udev is now provided by systemd or eudev.
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 18:40:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130918184035.24b2c345@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5239CF12.6040308@mind.be>
Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 18:04:34 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> > Right, that's one way of seeing things, indeed. It sounds a bit
> > convoluted to me, though. When a package A needs a specific feature
> > from package B (such as gudev), I believe it makes sense for
> > package B to provide a sub-option that package A can select, rather
> > than package A having intimate knowledge of the dependencies needed
> > by package B to enable whatever feature package A needs to have
> > from package B.
>
> Makes sense, but we probably already have tons of these already. If
> gudev would have been added in the normal way instead of introducing
> the all_extras option, then the implementors of network-manager and
> udisks wouldn't even have noticed that udev had to be compiled in a
> specific way: since these tools already select libglib2, udev would
> have been compiled with gudev support.
True.
> Really, the all-extras is historical accident because a long time
> ago udev's configure had an EXTRAS=... option in its build commands.
Right. But the extras have more dependencies that just glib2: it also
depends on hwdata and on acl. Will glib2 be sufficient to get gudev
built, for use by udisks? Maybe.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-18 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-06 14:01 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package: udev is now provided by systemd or eudev eric.le.bihan.dev at free.fr
2013-09-06 14:08 ` Eric Le Bihan
2013-09-10 20:24 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-17 10:40 ` Eric Le Bihan
2013-09-18 4:45 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 6:52 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-17 18:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 6:57 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-18 15:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 16:04 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-18 16:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-09-18 21:46 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-17 5:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-17 12:53 ` Eric Le Bihan
2013-09-17 18:45 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 7:00 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-18 15:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 16:06 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-18 16:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 17:34 ` Sagaert Johan
2013-09-18 17:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-18 18:13 ` Sagaert Johan
2013-09-18 18:05 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package: udev is now provided bysystemd " Sagaert Johan
2013-09-18 18:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130918184035.24b2c345@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox