From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2013-09-19
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 05:41:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130921054145.52b70d5e@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130920063008.7C55952C101@lolut.humanoidz.org>
Hello,
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:30:08 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> arc | host-gcc-initial-4.8-arc | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/ff903ce970ea652cc1aa57a5eb57e923dc4c5405/
> arc | host-gcc-initial-4.8-arc | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d3b2e4e32d531c08c19d39b248898fe462b81d8f/
> arc | host-gcc-initial-4.8-arc | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/76a2ab46ef7183f14eec944db4a598325e00b503/
Hum, apparently on ARC, building libgcc requires having the C library
headers. So, due to the change to build gcc in two passes instead of
three, we're building libgcc in the first pass, before the C library is
built, causing (I believe) the above failure. Mischa, if you have any
insights about this, I'm interested :)
Considering this problem, and the other SSP problems, I'm starting to
wonder if my patch that changes the toolchain build mechanism to use
two passes instead of three shouldn't be reverted for now, until I find
the time to investigate all the problems that it is causing.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-21 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-20 6:30 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2013-09-19 Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-20 8:29 ` Michael Rommel
2013-09-20 9:09 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-09-20 9:23 ` Michael Rommel
2013-09-21 1:29 ` Matt Weber
2013-09-25 19:41 ` Matt Weber
2013-09-21 3:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-21 3:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-09-21 5:19 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-09-21 7:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-24 13:56 ` Mischa Jonker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130921054145.52b70d5e@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox