From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2013-09-19
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 07:19:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hadebvkm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130921054145.52b70d5e@skate> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Sat, 21 Sep 2013 05:41:45 +0200")
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:
Thomas> Hello,
Thomas> On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:30:08 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> arc | host-gcc-initial-4.8-arc | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/ff903ce970ea652cc1aa57a5eb57e923dc4c5405/
>> arc | host-gcc-initial-4.8-arc | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d3b2e4e32d531c08c19d39b248898fe462b81d8f/
>> arc | host-gcc-initial-4.8-arc | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/76a2ab46ef7183f14eec944db4a598325e00b503/
Thomas> Hum, apparently on ARC, building libgcc requires having the C library
Thomas> headers. So, due to the change to build gcc in two passes instead of
Thomas> three, we're building libgcc in the first pass, before the C library is
Thomas> built, causing (I believe) the above failure. Mischa, if you have any
Thomas> insights about this, I'm interested :)
Thomas> Considering this problem, and the other SSP problems, I'm starting to
Thomas> wonder if my patch that changes the toolchain build mechanism to use
Thomas> two passes instead of three shouldn't be reverted for now, until I find
Thomas> the time to investigate all the problems that it is causing.
I'm thinking the same. Will you have time to work on it in the next week
or so? Otherwise I think we should revert for now.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-21 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-20 6:30 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2013-09-19 Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-20 8:29 ` Michael Rommel
2013-09-20 9:09 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-09-20 9:23 ` Michael Rommel
2013-09-21 1:29 ` Matt Weber
2013-09-25 19:41 ` Matt Weber
2013-09-21 3:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-21 3:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-21 5:19 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2013-09-21 7:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-24 13:56 ` Mischa Jonker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hadebvkm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
--to=jacmet@uclibc.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox