* [Buildroot] ARC builds failing
@ 2013-10-01 7:58 Mischa Jonker
2013-10-01 9:53 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mischa Jonker @ 2013-10-01 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi all,
Any comments/suggestions on below patch?
> I can provide a patch that adds a
> 'uclibc- headers' target inside the uclibc package, and let
> gcc-initial depend on both uclibc-headers and linux-headers for ARC. That seems to work OK for me.
>
> Something like this:
>
> --- a/package/gcc/gcc-initial/gcc-initial.mk
> +++ b/package/gcc/gcc-initial/gcc-initial.mk
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ GCC_INITIAL_VERSION = $(GCC_VERSION)
> GCC_INITIAL_SITE = $(GCC_SITE)
> GCC_INITIAL_SOURCE = $(GCC_SOURCE)
> -HOST_GCC_INITIAL_DEPENDENCIES = $(HOST_GCC_COMMON_DEPENDENCIES)
> +HOST_GCC_INITIAL_DEPENDENCIES = $(HOST_GCC_COMMON_DEPENDENCIES)
> +uclibc-headers linux-headers
>
> HOST_GCC_INITIAL_EXTRACT_CMDS = $(HOST_GCC_EXTRACT_CMDS)
> diff --git a/package/uclibc/uclibc.mk b/package/uclibc/uclibc.mk index
> 3993d9b..30a5461 100644
> --- a/package/uclibc/uclibc.mk
> +++ b/package/uclibc/uclibc.mk
> @@ -547,6 +547,14 @@ define UCLIBC_INSTALL_STAGING_CMDS
> $(UCLIBC_INSTALL_UTILS_STAGING) endef
> +uclibc-headers: dirs uclibc-patch
> + $(MAKE1) -C $(UCLIBC_DIR) \
> + $(UCLIBC_MAKE_FLAGS) \
> + PREFIX=$(STAGING_DIR) \
> + DEVEL_PREFIX=/usr/ \
> + RUNTIME_PREFIX=$(STAGING_DIR) \
> + install_headers
> +
> uclibc-menuconfig: dirs uclibc-patch
> $(MAKE1) -C $(UCLIBC_DIR) \
> $(UCLIBC_MAKE_FLAGS) \
It fixes the ARC build which has been broken for a couple of weeks now.
Mischa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] ARC builds failing
2013-10-01 7:58 [Buildroot] ARC builds failing Mischa Jonker
@ 2013-10-01 9:53 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-02 13:46 ` Mischa Jonker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2013-10-01 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear Mischa Jonker,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:58:35 +0000, Mischa Jonker wrote:
> Any comments/suggestions on below patch?
Well, I'm considering reverting my patch that turns the 3 stages build
into a 2 stages build, because it causes too much problems (not only
the ARC one, which you fixed, but also problems related to SSP), and I
don't know when I'll have the time to investigate those problems, which
are not so easy.
If you have some time, and interest in digging into such issues, let me
know, we can probably work together on them.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] ARC builds failing
2013-10-01 9:53 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2013-10-02 13:46 ` Mischa Jonker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mischa Jonker @ 2013-10-02 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi Thomas,
> > Any comments/suggestions on below patch?
>
> Well, I'm considering reverting my patch that turns the 3 stages build into a
> 2 stages build, because it causes too much problems (not only the ARC one,
> which you fixed, but also problems related to SSP), and I don't know when
> I'll have the time to investigate those problems, which are not so easy.
>
> If you have some time, and interest in digging into such issues, let me know,
> we can probably work together on them.
Unfortunately I don't have a lot of time in the coming weeks, but Anton (on cc) is actually more involved with ARC GNU toolchain development than I am, and he may be able/interested to spend some time digging into these build problems.
Thanks,
Mischa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-02 13:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-01 7:58 [Buildroot] ARC builds failing Mischa Jonker
2013-10-01 9:53 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-02 13:46 ` Mischa Jonker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox