From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Patchwork cleanup #7: triaging proposal
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:07:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140316160712.GA3267@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LWP0FX4AAGP_ACZHgoxEAEwarpEdHchukxE+V=WJnXROg@mail.gmail.com>
Thomas, All,
On 2014-03-16 08:48 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire spake thusly:
> Here is a first patchwork cleanup based on the new patchwork cleanup
> proposal [1]. Let's see how this goes and evaluate after one or more
> sessions.
[--SNIP--]
Thanks for putting up this list! :-)
> A. Patches to keep:
> -------------------
>
> directfb-lua: new package
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/262971/
Vote: A, keep.
> [v2] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/265680/
Vote C: unsure.
> [2/2] arch/Config.in: Allow ARM to select BR2_BINFMT_FLAT
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/272450/
>
> arch/Config.in: Allow arm7tdmi to select BR2_BINFMT_FLAT
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/273066/
>
> [Note: the above two patches are related. The feedback in the patch is
> to introduce a split between ARCH_HAS_MMU and BR2_USE_MMU, and thus
> requires quite some work in the core infrastructure.]
As Thomas said, they can't go in as-is. It would be better to add
generic config options (_HAS_MMU, _USE_MMU et al.) first.
So I'd rather say:
Vote: C, unsure: we do not want _these_ patches, but a better way
to express such a configuration.
> [RFC] uclibc: Don't build shared library if !HAVE_SHARED
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/273175/
Vote: A, keep.
> Add pyside + shiboken packages
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275929/
Vote: A, keep. Needs heavy refresh, though.
> [v2,1/1] package: remove the trailing slash sign from $(PKG)_SITE variable
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/276237/
Vote: A, keep. Needs heavy refresh, though. Pretty trivial to do,
and very easy to automate. I'll take.
> [v2,1/1] u-boot: allow to pass a custom configuration file
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/276286/
Vote: C, unsure. This is likely to overwrite a uboot source file
with a local file, so we won't be able to generate conpliant
legal-info when a custom comnfig file is used.
> [v3,01/11] udev: explicitly include pthreads
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278298
Vote: C, unsure. There was no feedback on the reason why the change
was needed in the first place (Peter tested and it worked).
> [v3,02/11] sunxi-mali: add explicit pthread/dl/rt dependencies
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278295
Vote: C, unsure. Same as above.
> [v3,05/11] sunxi-cedarx: bump to newer version, use armel2 binaries, add demo
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278299
Vote: A, keep.
> [v3,08/11] libpng12: new package
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278300
>
> [v3,09/11] libpng: ensure libpng12 is installed before libpng
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278301
Vote: A, keep both.
> [v3,10/11] glmark2: new package
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278304
Vote: A, keep.
> [v3,11/11] mesa3d-demos: new package
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278305
Vote: A, keep.
> B. Patches to reject:
> ---------------------
>
> infra: display current task as title of the term window
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/265214/
Vote: B, reject.
> C. Unsure / need more investigation:
> ------------------------------------
>
> [RESEND] package/Makefile.in: Fix dependency for selecting uclinux as TARGET_OS
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/277119/
Vote: C, unsure. It looks related to the two other patches above:
[2/2] arch/Config.in: Allow ARM to select BR2_BINFMT_FLAT
arch/Config.in: Allow arm7tdmi to select BR2_BINFMT_FLAT
> libgcc erroneously built as armv5 for arm920t(armv4t)
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278212/
Vote: B, reject. Should be fixed by:
d3539dd5: arch: pass cpu option instead of tune option on ARM
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-16 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-16 7:48 [Buildroot] Patchwork cleanup #7: triaging proposal Thomas De Schampheleire
2014-03-16 16:07 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
[not found] ` <5325D7A3.4090704@gigabyte.getmyip.com>
2014-03-16 18:43 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-03-17 6:59 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-03-16 23:51 ` Ezequiel García
2014-03-18 4:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-03-18 10:39 ` Ezequiel García
2014-03-18 12:00 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2014-03-18 12:16 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2014-03-17 7:03 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-03-25 20:17 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140316160712.GA3267@free.fr \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox