Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] smack: new package.
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:55:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140421135542.26258821@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140421115606.GA4082@milhouse>

Dear Eric Le Bihan,

On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:56:07 +0200, Eric Le Bihan wrote:

> Thanks for the polishing! Wouldn't it be useful to add a stanza in the
> docs/manual/contribute.txt about performing some compliancy tests using these
> two configurations before submitting new packages? Are there any other
> criteria that could fit compliancy tests/checklist?

While reviewing these packages, I was indeed thinking of writing a
"package addition check list" for the manual. But I'm wondering if this
wouldn't replicate quite a lot of informations already in the manual,
though it's true the idea of testing with some specific toolchain
configurations isn't written anywhere.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-21 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-20 18:54 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/2] SMACK: mandatory access control Eric Le Bihan
2014-04-20 18:54 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] smack: new package Eric Le Bihan
2014-04-21 10:19   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-21 11:56     ` Eric Le Bihan
2014-04-21 11:55       ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-04-21 12:49         ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2014-04-24 20:14           ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-04-25  7:16             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-20 18:54 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] systemd: add SMACK support option Eric Le Bihan
2014-06-08 14:33   ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140421135542.26258821@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox