Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Buildroot] Clarify the Intel driver related patches in patchwork
@ 2014-07-29  7:22 Thomas Petazzoni
  2014-07-29 17:21 ` Ben Widawsky
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2014-07-29  7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

Ben, Bernd,

There are quite a few X.org intel driver related patches in patchwork,
but it is not clear which one both of you agree with, and therefore
which ones should be applied. Could you give me an update on:

 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/373074/ (this patch doesn't have a
 proper commit log)

 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/371342/

 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/371343/

 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/370975/

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] Clarify the Intel driver related patches in patchwork
  2014-07-29  7:22 [Buildroot] Clarify the Intel driver related patches in patchwork Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2014-07-29 17:21 ` Ben Widawsky
  2014-07-29 21:38   ` Bernd Kuhls
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ben Widawsky @ 2014-07-29 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:22:14AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Ben, Bernd,
> 
> There are quite a few X.org intel driver related patches in patchwork,
> but it is not clear which one both of you agree with, and therefore
> which ones should be applied. Could you give me an update on:
> 
>  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/373074/ (this patch doesn't have a
>  proper commit log)
> 
>  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/371342/
> 
>  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/371343/
> 
>  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/370975/
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas

A patch (not in that list) to bump to .913 would solve all problems for
me. It seems like Bernd would be okay with this as well, though he sent
that mail only to me, "So updating buildroot to 2.99.914 is ok for me
now." I presume he meant .913.

Feel free to mark all of mine obsolete, and let's see what Bernd's
response to this is. I'd vote for marking them all obsolete and doing
the .913 bump.

I'd be happy to do the .913 package, but I don't want to step on Bernd's
toes. Just let me know if you want it. It will take a day or two for me
to actually test it.

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] Clarify the Intel driver related patches in patchwork
  2014-07-29 17:21 ` Ben Widawsky
@ 2014-07-29 21:38   ` Bernd Kuhls
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2014-07-29 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

[posted and mailed]

Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> wrote in 
news:20140729172109.GA1263 at bwidawsk.net:

> A patch (not in that list) to bump to .913 would solve all problems for
> me. It seems like Bernd would be okay with this as well, though he sent
> that mail only to me, "So updating buildroot to 2.99.914 is ok for me
> now." I presume he meant .913.

Hi,

no, I meant .914, which was released only several hours after .913 ;)
I just sent a new series for review which also cleans up the DRI mess now 
present in the intel driver configure.ac. I hope I did not miss a combination 
of options, please test my new patch.

Regards, Bernd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-29 21:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-29  7:22 [Buildroot] Clarify the Intel driver related patches in patchwork Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-29 17:21 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-07-29 21:38   ` Bernd Kuhls

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox