From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] libelf: Removes the package
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:11:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140828131122.2a0d4533@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409219230-17443-5-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Dear Gregory CLEMENT,
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:47:10 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> The elfutils package provides a more recent version of the
> libelf. Some packages such as ltrace need this more recent
> version. Having two packages providing the same library leads to some
> conflicts or dependency problems. For instance at the end we had only
> one libelf.a when the 2 packages were selected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> package/Config.in | 1 -
> package/libelf/Config.in | 7 -
> package/libelf/libelf-0.8.10-Elf64-fixups.patch | 12361 ----------------------
> package/libelf/libelf.mk | 23 -
> 4 files changed, 12392 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 package/libelf/Config.in
> delete mode 100644 package/libelf/libelf-0.8.10-Elf64-fixups.patch
> delete mode 100644 package/libelf/libelf.mk
When removing a package, the config option of the package should be
moved to Config.in.legacy to allow the user to be warned that he is
using a no longer available package.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-28 9:47 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] Use only elfutils package to provide the libelf library Gregory CLEMENT
2014-08-28 9:47 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] ltrace: Removes the libelf dependency Gregory CLEMENT
2014-08-28 9:58 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-08-28 9:47 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] avrdude: Depend on elfutils instead of libelf to get the libel library Gregory CLEMENT
2014-08-28 10:02 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-08-28 10:04 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-08-28 9:47 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] kexec-lite: Depends on elfutils instead of libelf to get the libelf library Gregory CLEMENT
2014-08-28 10:06 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-08-28 9:47 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] libelf: Removes the package Gregory CLEMENT
2014-08-28 11:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-08-28 11:53 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-08-28 9:51 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] Use only elfutils package to provide the libelf library Gregory CLEMENT
2014-08-28 9:53 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-08-28 10:02 ` Gregory CLEMENT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140828131122.2a0d4533@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox