Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] arch: do not distinguish revisions of ARM1136JF-S
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:48:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140915214841.GD3878@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140915233916.55c17894@free-electrons.com>

Thomas, All,

On 2014-09-15 23:39 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:33:39 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > > Note that the removal of the two options should not break existing
> > > full .config, since the hidden option BR2_arm1136jf_s becomes again a
> > > visible option to select the CPU.
> > 
> > But it would break a defconfig.
> 
> Right. But I believe that when we change the default value of an
> option, we also break a defconfig, and we don't include that as part of
> the Config.in.legacy handling (but also because it's obviously more
> complicated).
> 
> > As suggested on IRC, move the BR2_arm1136jf_s_r1 to Config.legacy, and
> > have it select BR2_arm1136jf_s, so the user can re-use a defconfig.
> 
> Hum, why just BR2_arm1136jf_s_r1 and not BR2_arm1136jf_s_r0 ?

Yes, of course.

I re-did my mental flow, and not having _r0 in legacy does not fly.
We need both in legacy, indeed.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-15 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-15 21:01 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] Fix march/mcpu conflict on ARM Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 21:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] arch: remove BR2_arm920 reference Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 21:08   ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-09-18 20:12   ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-09-15 21:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] arch: remove BR2_arm10t Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 21:13   ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-09-15 21:16     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-18 20:12   ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-09-15 21:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] arch: do not distinguish revisions of ARM1136JF-S Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 21:16   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-09-15 21:33   ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-09-15 21:39     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 21:44       ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-09-15 21:50         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 22:36           ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-09-15 22:02         ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-09-15 22:37           ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-09-15 21:48       ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2014-09-15 21:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] arch: remove BR2_GCC_TARGET_ARCH definitions on ARM Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 22:09   ` Yann E. MORIN

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140915214841.GD3878@free.fr \
    --to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox