* [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] docs/manual: document the new patch naming convention
@ 2014-12-05 18:06 Yann E. MORIN
2014-12-07 20:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2014-12-05 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
To ease generating patches, we now use a naming convention that is in
line with what git-format-patch does, that is:
- do not prefix patches with the package name
- prefix patches with a 4-digit mber
- start numbering at 0001
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
---
Changes v1 -> v2:
- reword slightly (Thomas DS)
---
docs/manual/patch-policy.txt | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/manual/patch-policy.txt b/docs/manual/patch-policy.txt
index 745f58d..6e27e71 100644
--- a/docs/manual/patch-policy.txt
+++ b/docs/manual/patch-policy.txt
@@ -31,16 +31,23 @@ Most patches are provided within Buildroot, in the package
directory; these typically aim to fix cross-compilation, libc support,
or other such issues.
-These patch files should be named +<packagename>-<number>-<description>.patch+.
-
-A +series+ file, as used by +quilt+, may also be added in the
-package directory. In that case, the +series+ file defines the patch
-application order.
+These patch files should be named +<number>-<description>.patch+.
.Notes
- The patch files coming with Buildroot should not contain any package version
-reference in their filename.
-- The field +<number>+ in the patch file name refers to the 'apply order'.
+ reference in their filename.
+- The field +<number>+ in the patch file name refers to the 'apply order',
+ and shall start at 1; It is preferred to pad the number with zeros up to 4
+ digits, like 'git-format-patch' does. E.g.: +0001-foobar-the-buz.patch+
+- Previously, it was mandatory for patches to be prefixed with the name of
+ the package, like +<package>-<number>-<description>.patch+, but that is
+ no longer the case. Existing packages will be fixed as time passes. 'Do
+ not prefix patches with the package name.'
+- Previously, a +series+ file, as used by +quilt+, could also be added in
+ the package directory. In that case, the +series+ file defines the patch
+ application order. This is deprecated, and will be removed in the future.
+ 'Do not use a series file.'
+
==== Global patch directory
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] docs/manual: document the new patch naming convention
2014-12-05 18:06 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] docs/manual: document the new patch naming convention Yann E. MORIN
@ 2014-12-07 20:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2014-12-07 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear Yann E. MORIN,
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 19:06:24 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> To ease generating patches, we now use a naming convention that is in
> line with what git-format-patch does, that is:
> - do not prefix patches with the package name
> - prefix patches with a 4-digit mber
> - start numbering at 0001
>
> Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
> Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
> Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
> Cc: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Applied, thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] docs/manual: document the new patch naming convention
@ 2014-10-14 7:40 Yann E. MORIN
2014-10-27 0:17 ` Samuel Martin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2014-10-14 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
To ease generating patches, we now use a naming convention that is in
line with what git-format-patch does, that is:
- do not prefix patches with the package name
- prefix patches with a 4-digit mber
- start numbering at 0001
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
---
Changes v1 -> v2:
- rewprd slightly (Thomas DS)
---
docs/manual/patch-policy.txt | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/manual/patch-policy.txt b/docs/manual/patch-policy.txt
index 745f58d..6e27e71 100644
--- a/docs/manual/patch-policy.txt
+++ b/docs/manual/patch-policy.txt
@@ -31,16 +31,23 @@ Most patches are provided within Buildroot, in the package
directory; these typically aim to fix cross-compilation, libc support,
or other such issues.
-These patch files should be named +<packagename>-<number>-<description>.patch+.
-
-A +series+ file, as used by +quilt+, may also be added in the
-package directory. In that case, the +series+ file defines the patch
-application order.
+These patch files should be named +<number>-<description>.patch+.
.Notes
- The patch files coming with Buildroot should not contain any package version
-reference in their filename.
-- The field +<number>+ in the patch file name refers to the 'apply order'.
+ reference in their filename.
+- The field +<number>+ in the patch file name refers to the 'apply order',
+ and shall start at 1; It is preferred to pad the number with zeros up to 4
+ digits, like 'git-format-patch' does. E.g.: +0001-foobar-the-buz.patch+
+- Previously, it was mandatory for patches to be prefixed with the name of
+ the package, like +<package>-<number>-<description>.patch+, but that is
+ no longer the case. Existing packages will be fixed as time passes. 'Do
+ not prefix patches with the package name.'
+- Previously, a +series+ file, as used by +quilt+, could also be added in
+ the package directory. In that case, the +series+ file defines the patch
+ application order. This is deprecated, and will be removed in the future.
+ 'Do not use a series file.'
+
==== Global patch directory
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] docs/manual: document the new patch naming convention
2014-10-14 7:40 Yann E. MORIN
@ 2014-10-27 0:17 ` Samuel Martin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Martin @ 2014-10-27 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
> To ease generating patches, we now use a naming convention that is in
> line with what git-format-patch does, that is:
> - do not prefix patches with the package name
> - prefix patches with a 4-digit mber
> - start numbering at 0001
>
> Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
> Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
> Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
> Cc: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
--
Samuel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-07 20:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-05 18:06 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] docs/manual: document the new patch naming convention Yann E. MORIN
2014-12-07 20:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-14 7:40 Yann E. MORIN
2014-10-27 0:17 ` Samuel Martin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox