From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/openocd: fix libftdi mis-detection
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150103213931.4c6874fb@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420233568-10133-3-git-send-email-s.martin49@gmail.com>
Dear Samuel Martin,
On Fri, 2 Jan 2015 22:19:28 +0100, Samuel Martin wrote:
> By-pass failing ac_search_libs check when libftdi is enabled.
>
> Fixes:
> http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/e90/e90b4d5ad79d99487f21c9d18581e8eba7034501/
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
> ---
> package/openocd/openocd.mk | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/package/openocd/openocd.mk b/package/openocd/openocd.mk
> index ad1f95b..34a2bbd 100644
> --- a/package/openocd/openocd.mk
> +++ b/package/openocd/openocd.mk
> @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ OPENOCD_VERSION = 0.8.0
> OPENOCD_SOURCE = openocd-$(OPENOCD_VERSION).tar.bz2
> OPENOCD_SITE = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/openocd/openocd/$(OPENOCD_VERSION)
>
> -OPENOCD_CONF_ENV = CFLAGS="$(TARGET_CFLAGS) -std=gnu99"
> +OPENOCD_CONF_ENV = CFLAGS="$(TARGET_CFLAGS) -std=gnu99" \
> + $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_LIBFTDI),ac_cv_search_ftdi_new=yes)
I don't really like this proposal. The test works just fine on
ARM/shared library, and appears to fail only on Blackfin/FLAT. The
config.log contains:
configure:14862: checking for library containing ftdi_new
configure:14893: /home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/usr/bin/bfin-uclinux-gcc -o conftest -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os -Wl,-elf2flt -static -std=gnu99 -I/home/tho
mas/projets/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -elf2flt -static conftest.c -L/home/thomas/projets/bu
ildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib -lftdi -lusb >&5
/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/libusb.a(libusb_la-core.o): In function `_usb_detach_kernel_driver_np':
core.c:(.text+0x96): undefined reference to `_libusb_detach_kernel_driver'
/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/libusb.a(libusb_la-core.o): In function `_usb_get_driver_np':
core.c:(.text+0xee): undefined reference to `_libusb_kernel_driver_active'
/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/libusb.a(libusb_la-core.o): In function `_usb_get_descriptor_by_endpoint':
core.c:(.text+0x16a): undefined reference to `_libusb_control_transfer'
[... more of such errors...]
So, I'd prefer to see a solution that actually solves the missing
undefined references, rather than working around this by passing
ac_cv_search_ftdi_new. Or at least an explanation giving the details as
to why passing ac_cv_search_ftdi_new is the appropriate solution for
the problem.
I'll mark your patch as Changes Requested. Can you submit an updated
version with either more details, or a better solution?
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-03 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-02 21:19 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/openocd: explicitly disable unselected adapters Samuel Martin
2015-01-02 21:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] package/openocd: disable aice programmer on non-MMU architecture Samuel Martin
2015-01-03 20:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-01-02 21:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/openocd: fix libftdi mis-detection Samuel Martin
2015-01-03 20:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-01-05 20:08 ` Samuel Martin
2015-01-03 20:35 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/openocd: explicitly disable unselected adapters Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150103213931.4c6874fb@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox