From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 2/3] python-cheetah: add host-package support
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:47:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150310234726.1b583693@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54FF72A3.4040701@mind.be>
Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:39:31 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> This should probably carry a comment to remember what you explained in an
> earlier mail, e.g.:
>
> # Runtime dependency on markdown is not expressed in Config.in for host package
>
> and perhaps a fuller explanation in the commit log (explaining that setuptools
> will download it if it can't be found).
Agreed. All those "unusual" dependencies should have a comment in
the .mk file.
> BTW, Thomas, when you committed python-cheetah you removed the runtime
> dependency on markdown because there are some examples you can run without
> markdown. Is that the way we work? The cheetah package itself declares a
> dependency on markdown because one of its classes (Filters.Markdown) uses it. Of
> course, as long as you don't use that particular filter, there won't be a
> problem. But it feels weird to me that we remove a dependency that is claimed by
> a package, unless there is a good reason for it (and I don't count saving 260K
> of .pyc files as a good enough reason).
"Way we work" is fairly loosely defined when it comes to interpreted
languages and more-or-less optional dependencies :-)
Should python-cheetah select all the possible dependencies it may use
for all its filters, or should it leave this responsibility to the
Buildroot user ? Not easy to decide.
Since the dependency was apparently not strictly needed, and there was
(as far as I remember) no comment justifying the dependency, it seemed
natural to me to remove this dependency. That being said, I wouldn't be
offended at all if we decide to re-introduce the dependency, provided a
comment indicating why we're adding this not-really mandatory
dependency.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-10 18:24 [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 1/3] pkg-cmake: allow to build package in a subdirectory Gwenhael Goavec-Merou
2015-03-10 17:35 ` Samuel Martin
2015-03-10 17:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-10 21:43 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-03-10 21:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-10 18:24 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 2/3] python-cheetah: add host-package support Gwenhael Goavec-Merou
2015-03-10 22:39 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-03-10 22:47 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-03-10 23:02 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-03-10 23:07 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-03-11 8:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-10 18:24 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 3/3] GNURadio: new package Gwenhael Goavec-Merou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150310234726.1b583693@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox