Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 2/3] python-cheetah: add host-package support
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:47:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150310234726.1b583693@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54FF72A3.4040701@mind.be>

Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,

On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:39:31 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:

>  This should probably carry a comment to remember what you explained in an
> earlier mail, e.g.:
> 
> # Runtime dependency on markdown is not expressed in Config.in for host package
> 
> and perhaps a fuller explanation in the commit log (explaining that setuptools
> will download it if it can't be found).

Agreed. All those "unusual" dependencies should have a comment in
the .mk file.

>  BTW, Thomas, when you committed python-cheetah you removed the runtime
> dependency on markdown because there are some examples you can run without
> markdown. Is that the way we work? The cheetah package itself declares a
> dependency on markdown because one of its classes (Filters.Markdown) uses it. Of
> course, as long as you don't use that particular filter, there won't be a
> problem. But it feels weird to me that we remove a dependency that is claimed by
> a package, unless there is a good reason for it (and I don't count saving 260K
> of .pyc files as a good enough reason).

"Way we work" is fairly loosely defined when it comes to interpreted
languages and more-or-less optional dependencies :-)

Should python-cheetah select all the possible dependencies it may use
for all its filters, or should it leave this responsibility to the
Buildroot user ? Not easy to decide.

Since the dependency was apparently not strictly needed, and there was
(as far as I remember) no comment justifying the dependency, it seemed
natural to me to remove this dependency. That being said, I wouldn't be
offended at all if we decide to re-introduce the dependency, provided a
comment indicating why we're adding this not-really mandatory
dependency.

Cheers,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-10 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-10 18:24 [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 1/3] pkg-cmake: allow to build package in a subdirectory Gwenhael Goavec-Merou
2015-03-10 17:35 ` Samuel Martin
2015-03-10 17:56   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-10 21:43     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-03-10 21:54       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-10 18:24 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 2/3] python-cheetah: add host-package support Gwenhael Goavec-Merou
2015-03-10 22:39   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-03-10 22:47     ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-03-10 23:02       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-03-10 23:07         ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-03-11  8:34         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-10 18:24 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 3/3] GNURadio: new package Gwenhael Goavec-Merou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150310234726.1b583693@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox