From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Worried about patches not being merged?
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:09:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150319120923.65bda6ab@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TH9VnnocY3CWhuiDOL6mZMSCZj+5GXTJpE5yna5pnGqKj8Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:45:02 +0100, Angelo Compagnucci wrote:
> > It's written in Django, and the code base is small as I said, so should
> > be easy to get involved. And the maintainer is also very nice, so
> > contributing shouldn't be a problem. patchwork's maintainer is even
> > using Buildroot himself, and he has contributed a number of patches, so
> > the project is definitely not unknown to him.
>
> I'm already looking at the code!
Cool!
> > This is definitely not the workflow we use today, and probably not the
> > one we would like to use.
>
> Yes, it is out of the box. But changing that workwflow is really easy.
> From my experiments, you can adapt it to buildroot workflow, in which
> a patch can be applied only after a severe review.
Ah, really? Could you describe a bit the workflow / how it would work ?
> Yes, I know, and that's unfortunate. Btw I think this is a ckicken egg
> problem, if user patches get reviewed after month, users lose interest
> and then tend to contribute less.
Yes, I fully agree on this. And that's why I spending *all* my
Buildroot time on reviewing/merging patches from others.
> Count on me and please delegate to me patches you think I can help
> review, I'm learning but I want to contribute more!
When, just pick whatever patches in the queue you believe you are
competent to review / test / ack.
> Yes, can understand and I think the problem is not with this patches,
> but the pile of new packages / medium level patches / newbie patches.
Well, is there really such a huge pile of new packages / medium level
patches / newbie patches ? We tend to apply them fairly quickly, in
general.
If there are so many "easy" patches, then please review / test / ack
them. Look at the A/R/T column at
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/. It indicates the
number of Acked-by, Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags. As you can see,
it's almost 0 0 0 for all patches. Which means nobody reviewed, tested
or acked the patches.
Also, if you think one patch is ready, has been given some
Acked/Reviewed/Tested tags and still doesn't get applied, please ping
me on IRC with a link to this patch.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-04 22:21 [Buildroot] Worried about patches not being merged? Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-18 20:01 ` Jörg Krause
2015-03-19 8:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-20 15:33 ` Jörg Krause
2015-03-20 15:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-19 8:35 ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-19 9:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-19 9:34 ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-19 10:25 ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-19 10:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-19 10:45 ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-19 11:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-03-19 22:27 ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-20 16:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150319120923.65bda6ab@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox