Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Worried about patches not being merged?
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:09:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150319120923.65bda6ab@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TH9VnnocY3CWhuiDOL6mZMSCZj+5GXTJpE5yna5pnGqKj8Lg@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:45:02 +0100, Angelo Compagnucci wrote:

> > It's written in Django, and the code base is small as I said, so should
> > be easy to get involved. And the maintainer is also very nice, so
> > contributing shouldn't be a problem. patchwork's maintainer is even
> > using Buildroot himself, and he has contributed a number of patches, so
> > the project is definitely not unknown to him.
> 
> I'm already looking at the code!

Cool!

> > This is definitely not the workflow we use today, and probably not the
> > one we would like to use.
> 
> Yes, it is out of the box. But changing that workwflow is really easy.
> From my experiments, you can adapt it to buildroot workflow, in which
> a patch can be applied only after a severe review.

Ah, really? Could you describe a bit the workflow / how it would work ?

> Yes, I know, and that's unfortunate. Btw I think this is a ckicken egg
> problem, if user patches get reviewed after month, users lose interest
> and then tend to contribute less.

Yes, I fully agree on this. And that's why I spending *all* my
Buildroot time on reviewing/merging patches from others.

> Count on me and please delegate to me patches you think I can help
> review, I'm learning but I want to contribute more!

When, just pick whatever patches in the queue you believe you are
competent to review / test / ack.

> Yes, can understand and I think the problem is not with this patches,
> but the pile of new packages / medium level patches / newbie patches.

Well, is there really such a huge pile of new packages / medium level
patches / newbie patches ? We tend to apply them fairly quickly, in
general.

If there are so many "easy" patches, then please review / test / ack
them. Look at the A/R/T column at
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/. It indicates the
number of Acked-by, Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags. As you can see,
it's almost 0 0 0 for all patches. Which means nobody reviewed, tested
or acked the patches.

Also, if you think one patch is ready, has been given some
Acked/Reviewed/Tested tags and still doesn't get applied, please ping
me on IRC with a link to this patch.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-19 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-04 22:21 [Buildroot] Worried about patches not being merged? Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-18 20:01 ` Jörg Krause
2015-03-19  8:20   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-20 15:33     ` Jörg Krause
2015-03-20 15:37       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-19  8:35   ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-19  9:16     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-19  9:34       ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-19 10:25         ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-19 10:26         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-19 10:45           ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-19 11:09             ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-03-19 22:27               ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-20 16:02                 ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150319120923.65bda6ab@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox