[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] bfin: remove the dependency of flat shared mode to shared library

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] bfin: remove the dependency of flat shared mode to shared library

[Sonic Zhang]

From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>

Blackfin flat shared library isn't generated and linked in the same way
as the ELF shared library. So, don't mark it depend on the static library
only.

Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
---
 arch/Config.in |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/Config.in b/arch/Config.in
index 16ad8be..6179960 100644
--- a/arch/Config.in
+++ b/arch/Config.in
@@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SEP_DATA
 
 config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED
 	bool "Shared binary"
-	select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED
 	help
 	  Allow to load and link indiviual FLAT binaries at run time.
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

[Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] bfin: put the libc link path of the flat shared and sep data formats before the sysroot link path

[Sonic Zhang]

From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>

The libc of the shared flat and sep data formats are different from the
standard flat libc in the sysroot lib path. In order to make application
link with proper libc, put their path before the sysroot link path.

Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
---
 package/Makefile.in |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/package/Makefile.in b/package/Makefile.in
index 803b162..e88d1ad 100644
--- a/package/Makefile.in
+++ b/package/Makefile.in
@@ -153,12 +153,12 @@ TARGET_LDFLAGS += $(if $($(PKG)_FLAT_STACKSIZE),-elf2flt=-s$($(PKG)_FLAT_STACKSI
 endif
 
 ifeq ($(BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED),y)
-TARGET_LDFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
+TARGET_LDFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0 -L$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/mid-shared-library
 TARGET_CFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
 TARGET_CXXFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
 endif
 ifeq ($(BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SEP_DATA),y)
-TARGET_LDFLAGS += -msep-data
+TARGET_LDFLAGS += -msep-data -L$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/msep-data
 TARGET_CFLAGS += -msep-data
 TARGET_CXXFLAGS += -msep-data
 endif
-- 
1.7.9.5

[Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] bfin: put the libc link path of the flat shared and sep data formats before the sysroot link path

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Sonic Zhang,

On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:59:16 +0800, Sonic Zhang wrote:
> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
> 
> The libc of the shared flat and sep data formats are different from the
> standard flat libc in the sysroot lib path. In order to make application
> link with proper libc, put their path before the sysroot link path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
> ---
>  package/Makefile.in |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/package/Makefile.in b/package/Makefile.in
> index 803b162..e88d1ad 100644
> --- a/package/Makefile.in
> +++ b/package/Makefile.in
> @@ -153,12 +153,12 @@ TARGET_LDFLAGS += $(if $($(PKG)_FLAT_STACKSIZE),-elf2flt=-s$($(PKG)_FLAT_STACKSI
>  endif
>  
>  ifeq ($(BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED),y)
> -TARGET_LDFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
> +TARGET_LDFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0 -L$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/mid-shared-library
>  TARGET_CFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
>  TARGET_CXXFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
>  endif
>  ifeq ($(BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SEP_DATA),y)
> -TARGET_LDFLAGS += -msep-data
> +TARGET_LDFLAGS += -msep-data -L$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/msep-data
>  TARGET_CFLAGS += -msep-data
>  TARGET_CXXFLAGS += -msep-data
>  endif

Thanks for this patch. I did some quick testing with
BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED with and without your patch, and I do not see a
difference. For example, I've built strace with and without your patch
applied, and the resulting binary has the same size. Looking at
strace.gdb using readelf, I can see that the C library functions are
not inside the strace binary itself, while with a BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_ONE
build, the strace binary is definitely bigger and a readelf on
strace.gdb shows that the C library functions have been copied into the
binary.

So, could you give us an example of what this patch is fixing?

I'm sorry to ask such questions, but while the Blackfin architecture is
probably well known to you, it isn't to most of us, so some additional
details are always useful.

Thanks a lot!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] bfin: remove the dependency of flat shared mode to shared library

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Sonic Zhang,

On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:59:15 +0800, Sonic Zhang wrote:
> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
> 
> Blackfin flat shared library isn't generated and linked in the same way
> as the ELF shared library. So, don't mark it depend on the static library
> only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
> ---
>  arch/Config.in |    1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/Config.in b/arch/Config.in
> index 16ad8be..6179960 100644
> --- a/arch/Config.in
> +++ b/arch/Config.in
> @@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SEP_DATA
>  
>  config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED
>  	bool "Shared binary"
> -	select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED

If you don't select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED, then the only available
option amongst: static libs, static libs + shared libs, shared libs is
"static libs", which means that the "-static" flag is always passed. If
that's OK, then I'm fine with the patch.

The second sentence of your commit log is confusing however. You say
"don't mark it depend on the static library only". But it is exactly
what your patch is doing: since it's no longer select
BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED, it means that after your patch is applied,
when BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED is used, the *only* possibility is static
library only.

Could you clarify?

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] bfin: remove the dependency of flat shared mode to shared library

[Sonic Zhang]

Hi Thomas,

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Dear Sonic Zhang,
>
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:59:15 +0800, Sonic Zhang wrote:
>> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
>>
>> Blackfin flat shared library isn't generated and linked in the same way
>> as the ELF shared library. So, don't mark it depend on the static library
>> only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/Config.in |    1 -
>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/Config.in b/arch/Config.in
>> index 16ad8be..6179960 100644
>> --- a/arch/Config.in
>> +++ b/arch/Config.in
>> @@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SEP_DATA
>>
>>  config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED
>>       bool "Shared binary"
>> -     select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED
>
> If you don't select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED, then the only available
> option amongst: static libs, static libs + shared libs, shared libs is
> "static libs", which means that the "-static" flag is always passed. If
> that's OK, then I'm fine with the patch.
>
Yes, -static is OK in the link flag for FLAT shared mode.

> The second sentence of your commit log is confusing however. You say
> "don't mark it depend on the static library only". But it is exactly
> what your patch is doing: since it's no longer select
> BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED, it means that after your patch is applied,
> when BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED is used, the *only* possibility is static
> library only.

Sorry for the typo error. Should be "mark it depend on the static
library only"".

Regards,

Sonic

[Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] bfin: put the libc link path of the flat shared and sep data formats before the sysroot link path

[Sonic Zhang]

Hi Thomas,

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Dear Sonic Zhang,
>
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:59:16 +0800, Sonic Zhang wrote:
>> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
>>
>> The libc of the shared flat and sep data formats are different from the
>> standard flat libc in the sysroot lib path. In order to make application
>> link with proper libc, put their path before the sysroot link path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
>> ---
>>  package/Makefile.in |    4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/package/Makefile.in b/package/Makefile.in
>> index 803b162..e88d1ad 100644
>> --- a/package/Makefile.in
>> +++ b/package/Makefile.in
>> @@ -153,12 +153,12 @@ TARGET_LDFLAGS += $(if $($(PKG)_FLAT_STACKSIZE),-elf2flt=-s$($(PKG)_FLAT_STACKSI
>>  endif
>>
>>  ifeq ($(BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED),y)
>> -TARGET_LDFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
>> +TARGET_LDFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0 -L$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/mid-shared-library
>>  TARGET_CFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
>>  TARGET_CXXFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
>>  endif
>>  ifeq ($(BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SEP_DATA),y)
>> -TARGET_LDFLAGS += -msep-data
>> +TARGET_LDFLAGS += -msep-data -L$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/msep-data
>>  TARGET_CFLAGS += -msep-data
>>  TARGET_CXXFLAGS += -msep-data
>>  endif
>
> Thanks for this patch. I did some quick testing with
> BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED with and without your patch, and I do not see a
> difference. For example, I've built strace with and without your patch
> applied, and the resulting binary has the same size. Looking at
> strace.gdb using readelf, I can see that the C library functions are
> not inside the strace binary itself, while with a BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_ONE
> build, the strace binary is definitely bigger and a readelf on
> strace.gdb shows that the C library functions have been copied into the
> binary.
>
> So, could you give us an example of what this patch is fixing?
>

If you build libgcrypt-1.6.3 without this patch, you will get following error.


libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "libgcrypt.la" && ln -s
"../libgcrypt.la" "libgcrypt.la" )
/bin/bash ../libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=link
/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bin/bfin-uclinux-gcc
-I/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os
-Wl,-elf2flt -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0 -D__NOMMU__
-D__uClinux__ -static -fvisibility=hidden -Wall  -elf2flt
-mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0 -static -o mpicalc
mpicalc-mpicalc.o libgcrypt.la
-L/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib
-lgpg-error
libtool: link: /home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bin/bfin-uclinux-gcc
-I/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os
-Wl,-elf2flt -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0 -D__NOMMU__
-D__uClinux__ -static -fvisibility=hidden -Wall -elf2flt
-mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0 -static -o mpicalc
mpicalc-mpicalc.o  ./.libs/libgcrypt.a
-L/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib
/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/libgpg-error.a
/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/mid-shared-library/crt1.o:
In function `__start':
/home/test/workspace/src/toolchain/uClibc/libc/sysdeps/linux/bfin/crt1.S:92:
undefined reference to `___shared_flat_add_library'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [mpicalc] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/build/libgcrypt-1.6.3/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/build/libgcrypt-1.6.3'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/build/libgcrypt-1.6.3'
make: *** [/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/build/libgcrypt-1.6.3/.stamp_built]
Error 2


Regards,

Sonic

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] bfin: remove the dependency of flat shared mode to shared library

[Arnout Vandecappelle]

On 23/03/15 03:43, Sonic Zhang wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
> <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> Dear Sonic Zhang,
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:59:15 +0800, Sonic Zhang wrote:
>>> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
>>>
>>> Blackfin flat shared library isn't generated and linked in the same way
>>> as the ELF shared library. So, don't mark it depend on the static library
>>> only.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/Config.in |    1 -
>>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/Config.in b/arch/Config.in
>>> index 16ad8be..6179960 100644
>>> --- a/arch/Config.in
>>> +++ b/arch/Config.in
>>> @@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SEP_DATA
>>>
>>>  config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED
>>>       bool "Shared binary"
>>> -     select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED
>>
>> If you don't select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED, then the only available
>> option amongst: static libs, static libs + shared libs, shared libs is
>> "static libs", which means that the "-static" flag is always passed. If
>> that's OK, then I'm fine with the patch.
>>
> Yes, -static is OK in the link flag for FLAT shared mode.

 But then it won't generate dynamically linked executables, right?


>> The second sentence of your commit log is confusing however. You say
>> "don't mark it depend on the static library only". But it is exactly
>> what your patch is doing: since it's no longer select
>> BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED, it means that after your patch is applied,
>> when BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED is used, the *only* possibility is static
>> library only.
> 
> Sorry for the typo error. Should be "mark it depend on the static
> library only"".

 The problem is the following: when we say 'depends on !STATIC', that typically
means that the package is using dlopen, which is not possible with FLAT. So it
would be wrong to say that FLAT selects BR2_STATIC_LIBS.

 The right solution would be to introduce something else for dlopen, and rename
all the BR2_STATIC_LIBS dependencies to that new symbol.


 Regards,
 Arnout


-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] bfin: remove the dependency of flat shared mode to shared library

[Sonic Zhang]

Hi Arnout,

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:
> On 23/03/15 03:43, Sonic Zhang wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
>> <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>>> Dear Sonic Zhang,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:59:15 +0800, Sonic Zhang wrote:
>>>> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
>>>>
>>>> Blackfin flat shared library isn't generated and linked in the same way
>>>> as the ELF shared library. So, don't mark it depend on the static library
>>>> only.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/Config.in |    1 -
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/Config.in b/arch/Config.in
>>>> index 16ad8be..6179960 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/Config.in
>>>> +++ b/arch/Config.in
>>>> @@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SEP_DATA
>>>>
>>>>  config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED
>>>>       bool "Shared binary"
>>>> -     select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED
>>>
>>> If you don't select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED, then the only available
>>> option amongst: static libs, static libs + shared libs, shared libs is
>>> "static libs", which means that the "-static" flag is always passed. If
>>> that's OK, then I'm fine with the patch.
>>>
>> Yes, -static is OK in the link flag for FLAT shared mode.
>
>  But then it won't generate dynamically linked executables, right?

Yes, Bfin FLAT shared format isn't the standard dynamic linked ELF.
For example, following command is used for FLAT shared.

bfin-uclinux-gcc -Wl,-elf2flt -mid-shared-library
-mshared-library-id=0 -static -D__NOMMU__ -Wall -o mpicalc
mpicalc-mpicalc.o  ./.libs/libgcrypt.a
-L/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib
/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/libgpg-error.a



>
>
>>> The second sentence of your commit log is confusing however. You say
>>> "don't mark it depend on the static library only". But it is exactly
>>> what your patch is doing: since it's no longer select
>>> BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED, it means that after your patch is applied,
>>> when BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED is used, the *only* possibility is static
>>> library only.
>>
>> Sorry for the typo error. Should be "mark it depend on the static
>> library only"".
>
>  The problem is the following: when we say 'depends on !STATIC', that typically
> means that the package is using dlopen, which is not possible with FLAT. So it
> would be wrong to say that FLAT selects BR2_STATIC_LIBS.

The FLAT share mode depends on STATIC other than !STATIC. So, I see no
error here.


Regards,

>
>  The right solution would be to introduce something else for dlopen, and rename
> all the BR2_STATIC_LIBS dependencies to that new symbol.
>


>
>  Regards,
>  Arnout
>
>
> --
> Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
> Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
> Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
> G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
> LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
> GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] bfin: remove the dependency of flat shared mode to shared library

[Arnout Vandecappelle]

On 26/03/15 09:55, Sonic Zhang wrote:
> Hi Arnout,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:
>> On 23/03/15 03:43, Sonic Zhang wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
>>> <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>>>> Dear Sonic Zhang,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:59:15 +0800, Sonic Zhang wrote:
>>>>> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blackfin flat shared library isn't generated and linked in the same way
>>>>> as the ELF shared library. So, don't mark it depend on the static library
>>>>> only.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  arch/Config.in |    1 -
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/Config.in b/arch/Config.in
>>>>> index 16ad8be..6179960 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/Config.in
>>>>> +++ b/arch/Config.in
>>>>> @@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SEP_DATA
>>>>>
>>>>>  config BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED
>>>>>       bool "Shared binary"
>>>>> -     select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED
>>>>
>>>> If you don't select BR2_BINFMT_SUPPORTS_SHARED, then the only available
>>>> option amongst: static libs, static libs + shared libs, shared libs is
>>>> "static libs", which means that the "-static" flag is always passed. If
>>>> that's OK, then I'm fine with the patch.
>>>>
>>> Yes, -static is OK in the link flag for FLAT shared mode.
>>
>>  But then it won't generate dynamically linked executables, right?
> 
> Yes, Bfin FLAT shared format isn't the standard dynamic linked ELF.
> For example, following command is used for FLAT shared.
> 
> bfin-uclinux-gcc -Wl,-elf2flt -mid-shared-library
> -mshared-library-id=0 -static -D__NOMMU__ -Wall -o mpicalc
> mpicalc-mpicalc.o  ./.libs/libgcrypt.a
> -L/home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib
> /home/sonic/projects/buildroot/output/host/usr/bfin-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/libgpg-error.a

 So I tried linking with a few different options, and it looks that with the
-mid-shared-library option, it's always a shared executable that is created even
if -static is specified as well. flthdr tells me:

Flags:        0x2 ( Has-PIC-GOT )

 When I link without -mid-shared-library and with -static, I get an executable with:

Flags:        0x1 ( Load-to-Ram )


 So basically, with BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED, you _always_ get shared and the
static options should be removed. Except that it's not shared in the way that we
use it in buildroot, because libdl is not available.

 So basically, the fix by Sonic Zhang does the correct thing, but it looks
pretty strange. Perhaps after adding an explanatory comment it could be accepted.

 I'll resend.


 Regards,
 Arnout


-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F

[Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] bfin: put the libc link path of the flat shared and sep data formats before the sysroot link path

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Sonic,

On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:59:16 +0800, Sonic Zhang wrote:
> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
> 
> The libc of the shared flat and sep data formats are different from the
> standard flat libc in the sysroot lib path. In order to make application
> link with proper libc, put their path before the sysroot link path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
> ---
>  package/Makefile.in |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/package/Makefile.in b/package/Makefile.in
> index 803b162..e88d1ad 100644
> --- a/package/Makefile.in
> +++ b/package/Makefile.in
> @@ -153,12 +153,12 @@ TARGET_LDFLAGS += $(if $($(PKG)_FLAT_STACKSIZE),-elf2flt=-s$($(PKG)_FLAT_STACKSI
>  endif
>  
>  ifeq ($(BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SHARED),y)
> -TARGET_LDFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
> +TARGET_LDFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0 -L$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/mid-shared-library
>  TARGET_CFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
>  TARGET_CXXFLAGS += -mid-shared-library -mshared-library-id=0
>  endif
>  ifeq ($(BR2_BINFMT_FLAT_SEP_DATA),y)
> -TARGET_LDFLAGS += -msep-data
> +TARGET_LDFLAGS += -msep-data -L$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/msep-data
>  TARGET_CFLAGS += -msep-data
>  TARGET_CXXFLAGS += -msep-data
>  endif

We finally discussed your patch today during a review meeting.
Unfortunately, your solution is not appropriate for two reasons:

 1) It applies to all cases, while the problem is completely specific
    to the Analog Devices Blackfin toolchain.

 2) The problem that needs to be solved is in fact that the external
    toolchain logic in Buildroot seems to not be copying the right
    sysroot. If you build with -mid-shared-library, then it's directly
    this libc.a variant that should be in $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib.

Could you instead investigate the external toolchain code to understand
why the appropriate sysroot doesn't get copied?

In the mean time, I'll mark your patch as Changes Requested in our
patch tracking system.

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] bfin: put the libc link path of the flat shared and sep data formats before the sysroot link path

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello Sonic,

First of all, thanks for replying so quickly. Since we haven't seen
much patches from you improving the Blackfin support in upstream
Buildroot, I wasn't sure you would answer our e-mail.

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 06:55:57 +0000, Zhang, Sonic wrote:

> The right sysroot of the Blackfin toolchain is copied by the external
> toolchain logic in buildroot. The problem is that the libc files for
> FLAT, Shared FLAT and Shared FLAT with separate data formats are put
> into different subfolders of the same blackfin toolchain for FLAT
> binary.

Absolutely.

> Do you suggest to copy the libc for current FLAT format type
> into $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib in the toolchain copy logic? If so, I can
> send a new patch.

Yes, but this should normally happen "magically". Let me take an
example from another toolchain to illustrate how it works.

If you take the CodeSourcery ARM toolchain, it has three sysroots:

 - One for ARMv5 (the default one)
 - One for ARMv4
 - One for ARMv7 Thumb2

See below:

$ ./bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -print-file-name=libc.a
/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/usr/lib/libc.a
$ ./bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv4t -print-file-name=libc.a
/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/armv4t/usr/lib/libc.a
$ ./bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv7-a -mthumb -print-file-name=libc.a
/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/thumb2/usr/lib/libc.a

If I build an ARMv5 system in Buildroot, then the sysroot from libc/ will
be copied to $(STAGING_DIR) :

$ md5sum output/staging/usr/lib/libc.a 
0c6a145ebbc860800152c2d8c82e5af9  output/staging/usr/lib/libc.a
$ md5sum output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/usr/lib/libc.a
0c6a145ebbc860800152c2d8c82e5af9  output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/usr/lib/libc.a

If I now build an ARMv4 system in Buildroot, then the sysroot from
libc/armv4t/ will be copied to $(STAGING_DIR) :

$ md5sum output/staging/usr/lib/libc.a 
21109c9b68203d10437446d998d782c7  output/staging/usr/lib/libc.a
$ md5sum output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/armv4t/usr/lib/libc.a
21109c9b68203d10437446d998d782c7  output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/armv4t/usr/lib/libc.a

And finally, if I build an ARMv7 Thumb2 system in Buildroot, then the
sysroot from libc/thumb2/ will be copied to $(STAGING_DIR) :

$ md5sum output/staging/usr/lib/libc.a 
d94693412ceac0839883ed0ece38c43f  output/staging/usr/lib/libc.a
$ md5sum output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/thumb2/usr/lib/libc.a
d94693412ceac0839883ed0ece38c43f  output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/thumb2/usr/lib/libc.a

This all gets done magically by the existing external toolchain logic,
with no special handling for this CodeSourcery toolchain. In all three
cases, we end up with $(STAGING_DIR) containing a copy of the sysroot
that corresponds to the selected architecture flags. If you want to try
this out by ourself, try the following configurations:

 - For ARMv5

BR2_arm=y
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL=y

 - For ARMv4

BR2_arm=y
BR2_arm920t=y
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL=y

 - For ARMv7/Thumb2

BR2_arm=y
BR2_cortex_a8=y
BR2_ARM_EABI=y
BR2_ARM_SOFT_FLOAT=y
BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2=y
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL=y

Now, back to the Blackfin toolchain, if we ask gcc for the location of
libc.a (like I did before with the ARM toolchain), we get :

 - With no special flags

$ ./bin/bfin-uclinux-gcc -print-file-name=libc.a
/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bfin-uclinux/bin/../bfin-uclinux/runtime/usr/lib/libc.a

 - With -mid-shared-library

$ ./bin/bfin-uclinux-gcc -mid-shared-library -print-file-name=libc.a
/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bfin-uclinux/bin/../bfin-uclinux/runtime/usr/lib/mid-shared-library/libc.a

 - With -msep-data

$ ./bin/bfin-uclinux-gcc -msep-data -print-file-name=libc.a
/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bfin-uclinux/bin/../bfin-uclinux/runtime/usr/lib/msep-data/libc.a

As you can see, it behaves like the CodeSourcery ARM toolchain:
depending on the gcc flags passed, it points to a different sysroot. So
my expectation is that the external toolchain logic that works for the
CodeSourcery ARM toolchain should also work for the ADI Blackfin
toolchain. Note that Buildroot specifically uses the location of libc.a
to determine where the sysroot is. See:

# Returns the location of the libc.a file for the given compiler + flags
define toolchain_find_libc_a
$$(readlink -f $$(LANG=C $(1) -print-file-name=libc.a))
endef

Can you investigate why the external toolchain logic doesn't work for
the Blackfin use case, and whether it can be fixed/extended to cover
this case ?

I saw your patch, which could be a work-around specific to the Blackfin
toolchain. It takes into account the mid-shared-library and msep-data
cases, but it doesn't take into account the other sysroot available in
the Blackfin toolchain:

$ ./output/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bfin-uclinux/bin/bfin-uclinux-gcc -print-multi-lib
.;
bf532-none;@mcpu=bf532-none
mid-shared-library;@mid-shared-library
msep-data;@msep-data
bf532-none/mid-shared-library;@mcpu=bf532-none at mid-shared-library
bf532-none/msep-data;@mcpu=bf532-none at msep-data

So we would have to add other cases for the bf532-none flag (but what
is this flag ? the gcc documentation documents -mcpu=bf532, but
certainly not -mcpu=bf532-none).

Could you look into this ?

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com