* [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/ccache: bump version to 3.1.11
@ 2015-03-29 11:52 Karoly Kasza
2015-03-29 11:58 ` Károly Kasza
2015-03-29 12:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Karoly Kasza @ 2015-03-29 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Signed-off-by: Karoly Kasza <kaszak@gmail.com>
---
package/ccache/ccache.mk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/ccache/ccache.mk b/package/ccache/ccache.mk
index 270ea4b..893b6ae 100644
--- a/package/ccache/ccache.mk
+++ b/package/ccache/ccache.mk
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
#
################################################################################
-CCACHE_VERSION = 3.1.8
+CCACHE_VERSION = 3.1.11
CCACHE_SITE = http://samba.org/ftp/ccache
CCACHE_SOURCE = ccache-$(CCACHE_VERSION).tar.xz
CCACHE_LICENSE = GPLv3+, others
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/ccache: bump version to 3.1.11
2015-03-29 11:52 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/ccache: bump version to 3.1.11 Karoly Kasza
@ 2015-03-29 11:58 ` Károly Kasza
2015-03-29 12:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Károly Kasza @ 2015-03-29 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi all,
based on the release notes at ccache.samba.org, there are only bugfix
releases since 3.1.x (hence the above patch should be safe to apply), but
the 3.2.x line are already exists. Should we start moving on to that major
version?
Regards,
Karoly
> -CCACHE_VERSION = 3.1.8
> +CCACHE_VERSION = 3.1.11
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20150329/8036e84a/attachment.html>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/ccache: bump version to 3.1.11
2015-03-29 11:52 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/ccache: bump version to 3.1.11 Karoly Kasza
2015-03-29 11:58 ` Károly Kasza
@ 2015-03-29 12:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-03-29 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear Karoly Kasza,
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:52:04 +0200, Karoly Kasza wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Karoly Kasza <kaszak@gmail.com>
> ---
> package/ccache/ccache.mk | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied, thanks. If you feel like it, sending a patch adding a hash
file would be good.
Also, there is still quite a lot of things to fix to get our ccache
support to a sane state. If you have some time, you could look at
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/287383/, especially the comments made
by Arnout, and try to improve the ccache support based on that.
Thanks a lot!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-29 12:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-29 11:52 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/ccache: bump version to 3.1.11 Karoly Kasza
2015-03-29 11:58 ` Károly Kasza
2015-03-29 12:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox