From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] core/pkg-kconfig: run the kconfig fixups after exiting configurators
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 00:38:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150612223849.GI3583@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150612233618.56f1e4dd@free-electrons.com>
Thomas, All,
On 2015-06-12 23:36 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 13:54:25 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > After we exit the configurators, we need to re-run the kconfig fixups to
> > ensure the user is not able to override them in the configurators.
> >
> > Currently, we schedule that "for later", by removing the corresponding
> > stamp file, so make will run the fixups "later".
> >
> > This means the user has access to the un-fixed .config file, which he
> > might decide to copy and use as a reference (not too bad, since we'd run
> > the fixups anyway; but not clean either).
>
> Until now, OK.
>
> > Furthermore, we'll need to have the .config file properly fixed-up
> > without requiring the full dependency chain up to the original
> > user-supplied (def)config, so we won't be able to rely on the stamp file
> > in the dependency list, so we'll need to run the fixups when exiting the
> > configurators anyway.
>
> But here, I'm lost.
Right, this has nothing to do in that commit log.
> > # Configuration editors (menuconfig, ...)
> > +#
> > +# Apply the kconfig fixups right after exiting the configurators, so
> > +# that the user always sees a .config file that is clean wrt. our
> > +# requirements.
> > +#
> > +# Because commands in $(1)_FIXUP_KCONFIG are probably using $(@D), we
> > +# fake it for the configurators (otherwise it is set to just '.', i.e.
> > +# the current directory where make is run, which happens to be in
> > +# $(TOPDIR), because the target of the rule is not an actual file, so
> > +# does not have any path component).
> > +#
> > +$$(addprefix $(1)-,$$($(2)_KCONFIG_EDITORS)): @D=$$($(2)_DIR)
> > $$(addprefix $(1)-,$$($(2)_KCONFIG_EDITORS)): $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_kconfig_fixup_done
> > $$($(2)_MAKE_ENV) $$(MAKE) -C $$($(2)_DIR) \
> > $$($(2)_KCONFIG_OPTS) $$(subst $(1)-,,$$@)
> > rm -f $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_{kconfig_fixup_done,configured,built}
> > rm -f $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_{target,staging,images}_installed
> > + $$(call $(1)_FIXUP_KCONFIG)
>
> I find a bit sad that we don't manage to use make dependencies to
> schedule the kconfig-fixup -> configurator -> kconfig-fixup thing
> logic, and that we have to manually recall $(1)_FIXUP_CONFIG.
And I just noticed that it should be named $(2)_FIXUP_CONFIG, not
$(1)_FIXUP_CONFIG. Will fix before I respin.
> I've put
> a bit of thought into it, but I indeed don't see a simple way of
> achieving that in a different way that the one you're proposing.
Well, I had it working at one point with tricky makefile dependencies,
that I did not fully understand myself, so I prefered to ditch them and
use simpler code that is easily understandable.
> The
> hack on @D is particularly tricky.
s/tricky/ugly/ ;-)
Yes you're right, hence the reason I put a big comment about it.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-06 11:54 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] core/pkg-kconfig: fix saving back the configuration (branch yem/pr8156) Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-06 11:54 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] core/pkg-kconfig: ensure kconfig file and fragments exist Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-12 21:24 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-12 22:12 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-06 11:54 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] core/pkg-kconfig: move the kconfig fixups to a macro Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-12 21:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-12 22:17 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-13 16:41 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-06-06 11:54 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] core/pkg-kconfig: run the kconfig fixups after exiting configurators Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-12 21:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-12 22:38 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2015-06-13 16:25 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-06-14 21:42 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-07-21 19:38 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-06 11:54 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] core/pkg-kconfig: allow saving config to a non-existing custom config file Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-12 21:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-12 23:19 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-12 21:46 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] core/pkg-kconfig: fix saving back the configuration (branch yem/pr8156) Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-12 23:23 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150612223849.GI3583@free.fr \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox