From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] core/pkg-kconfig: run the kconfig fixups after exiting configurators
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 23:36:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150612233618.56f1e4dd@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c011926dc0817e5b5685bc5519ae5cbd57b21888.1433591404.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Dear Yann E. MORIN,
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 13:54:25 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> After we exit the configurators, we need to re-run the kconfig fixups to
> ensure the user is not able to override them in the configurators.
>
> Currently, we schedule that "for later", by removing the corresponding
> stamp file, so make will run the fixups "later".
>
> This means the user has access to the un-fixed .config file, which he
> might decide to copy and use as a reference (not too bad, since we'd run
> the fixups anyway; but not clean either).
Until now, OK.
> Furthermore, we'll need to have the .config file properly fixed-up
> without requiring the full dependency chain up to the original
> user-supplied (def)config, so we won't be able to rely on the stamp file
> in the dependency list, so we'll need to run the fixups when exiting the
> configurators anyway.
But here, I'm lost.
> # Configuration editors (menuconfig, ...)
> +#
> +# Apply the kconfig fixups right after exiting the configurators, so
> +# that the user always sees a .config file that is clean wrt. our
> +# requirements.
> +#
> +# Because commands in $(1)_FIXUP_KCONFIG are probably using $(@D), we
> +# fake it for the configurators (otherwise it is set to just '.', i.e.
> +# the current directory where make is run, which happens to be in
> +# $(TOPDIR), because the target of the rule is not an actual file, so
> +# does not have any path component).
> +#
> +$$(addprefix $(1)-,$$($(2)_KCONFIG_EDITORS)): @D=$$($(2)_DIR)
> $$(addprefix $(1)-,$$($(2)_KCONFIG_EDITORS)): $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_kconfig_fixup_done
> $$($(2)_MAKE_ENV) $$(MAKE) -C $$($(2)_DIR) \
> $$($(2)_KCONFIG_OPTS) $$(subst $(1)-,,$$@)
> rm -f $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_{kconfig_fixup_done,configured,built}
> rm -f $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_{target,staging,images}_installed
> + $$(call $(1)_FIXUP_KCONFIG)
I find a bit sad that we don't manage to use make dependencies to
schedule the kconfig-fixup -> configurator -> kconfig-fixup thing
logic, and that we have to manually recall $(1)_FIXUP_CONFIG. I've put
a bit of thought into it, but I indeed don't see a simple way of
achieving that in a different way that the one you're proposing. The
hack on @D is particularly tricky.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-06 11:54 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] core/pkg-kconfig: fix saving back the configuration (branch yem/pr8156) Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-06 11:54 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] core/pkg-kconfig: ensure kconfig file and fragments exist Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-12 21:24 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-12 22:12 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-06 11:54 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] core/pkg-kconfig: move the kconfig fixups to a macro Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-12 21:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-12 22:17 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-13 16:41 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-06-06 11:54 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] core/pkg-kconfig: run the kconfig fixups after exiting configurators Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-12 21:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-06-12 22:38 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-13 16:25 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-06-14 21:42 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-07-21 19:38 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-06 11:54 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] core/pkg-kconfig: allow saving config to a non-existing custom config file Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-12 21:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-12 23:19 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-06-12 21:46 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] core/pkg-kconfig: fix saving back the configuration (branch yem/pr8156) Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-12 23:23 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150612233618.56f1e4dd@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox