From: rdkehn at yahoo.com <rdkehn@yahoo.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] Force rebuild of local site packages and theirs local dependencies
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:13:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150622161302.GA32191@dkarchlinux64.currentcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5587E032.8030506@syscom-instruments.com>
Hi Antony,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:15:14PM +0200, Viallard Anthony wrote:
> On 06/16/2015 09:50 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> >Dear Anthony Viallard,
> >
> >On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:21:28 +0200, Anthony Viallard wrote:
> >
> >>diff --git a/package/pkg-generic.mk b/package/pkg-generic.mk
> >>index d5b29f0..929a31c 100644
> >>--- a/package/pkg-generic.mk
> >>+++ b/package/pkg-generic.mk
> >>@@ -509,6 +509,10 @@ ifeq ($$(filter $(1),$$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)),)
> >> $$($(2)_TARGET_SOURCE) $$($(2)_TARGET_RSYNC): | dependencies
> >> endif
> >>
> >>+ifeq ($$($(2)_SITE_METHOD),local)
> >>+$$($(2)_TARGET_RSYNC): $(1)-clean-for-rebuild
> >>+endif
> >
> >Why don't you use "make <pkg>-rebuild" or "make <pkg>-reconfigure" ?
> >
> >The problem with your proposal is that you have arbitrarily decided to
> >make it always restart from the build step. What if some people want to
> >restart from the install step, or the configure step ?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Thomas
> >
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> The main thing is this not convenient. I have about 30 packages and we are a
> team. I don't want to check after each git pull the packages which have been
> modified and call make <pkg>-rebuild for each of them (and be aware about
> dependencies, for example calling libraries rebuild before because the
> <pkg>-rebuild target doesn't rebuild the dependencies).
>
> My patch is a quick workaround to do my needs. Moreover, like doug claims,
> the patch doesn't work. There is an issue. I will try to find why.
>
> If there was a "make rebuild" target and if the "make <pkg>-rebuild" was
> able to rebuild all the dependencies too, it will satisfy my needs.
>
Here is what I have done to support the workflow, I believe, you
want. I don't think... this is something that Buildroot needs to
support natively; but, maybe it could/should be documented
somewhere.
I create a custom directory structure, let's call it 'mycustom',
that mimics Buildroot's. The mycustom directory contains
proprietary bits to be incorporated into the Buildroot environment
while keeping them separate from Buildroot. I set
BR2_EXTERNAL=mycustom when executing the initial make to create the
output directory and specify the default configuration.
<Buildroot>/mycustom/Config.in contains:
comment "MyCustom"
menu "Libraries"
source "$BR2_EXTERNAL/package/libmycustom/Config.in"
endmenu
menu "Applications"
source "$BR2_EXTERNAL/package/mycustomapp/Config.in"
endmenu
In <Buildroot>/mycustom/external.mk, I add a mycustom-rebuild target
to rebuild all of my custom packages.
mycustom-rebuild:
@ sed -e '1,/#.MyCustom/d' \
-ne 's/^BR2_PACKAGE_\(.*\)=y/\1/p' \
$(BR2_CONFIG) | \
tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | \
sed -e 's/_/-/' | \
while read t; do \
$(MAKE1) -C $(BASE_DIR) O=$(O) \
$${t}-dirclean $${t}-rebuild || exit 1; \
done
$(MAKE) -C $(BASE_DIR) O=$(O) target-post-image
Presently, Buildroot puts all user provided options at the end of
BR2_CONFIG so it's sufficient to extract all BR2_PACKAGE_*
definitions after the the Config.in comment "# MyCustom". Each
extracted BR2_CONFIG definition becomes the make target to execute
after BR2_PACKAGE_ is stripped from the entry, it is changed to
lower case, and '_' is changed to '-'. For example,
BR2_PACKAGE_LIBMYCUSTOM is transformed to libmycustom. libmycustom
is then used to create the libmycustom-dirclean and
libmycustom-rebuild targets. Lastly, the target-post-image target
is executed to regenerate the root file system(s).
With this in place, after a 'git pull', I can simply execute 'make
mycustom-rebuild' to only rebuild all of my custom stuff.
As you can see there are clearly some personal preferences in the
mycustom-rebuild target that others may not want. This is why I
don't think this is something Buildroot needs to support natively.
Anyway, maybe this will help you implement the function you want.
Regards,
...doug
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-22 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-16 13:21 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] Force rebuild of local site packages and theirs local dependencies Anthony Viallard
2015-06-16 16:30 ` rdkehn at yahoo.com
2015-06-22 10:01 ` Viallard Anthony
2015-06-16 19:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-22 10:15 ` Viallard Anthony
2015-06-22 12:07 ` Viallard Anthony
2015-06-22 16:13 ` rdkehn at yahoo.com [this message]
2015-07-02 8:56 ` Viallard Anthony
2015-06-23 7:56 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2015-07-02 9:01 ` Viallard Anthony
2015-07-02 15:32 ` Jérôme Pouiller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150622161302.GA32191@dkarchlinux64.currentcomm.com \
--to=rdkehn@yahoo.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox