From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/3] package/cal3d: new package
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:35:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151219153519.38c52050@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151219142509.GA3394@free.fr>
Yann,
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:25:09 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> But in this precise case, I would:
> - dump the cal3d package
> - add a post-download hook (or an extra-download URL) to vsxu to also
> download cal3d
A post-download hook wouldn't play well with "make source", "make
legal-info" and all. We have to take this into account. But an
EXTRA_DOWNLOADS should work fine.
> - add a post-extract hook to vsxu to also extract cal3d in the correct
> location.
Could be a solution, I'll try this.
> Otherwise, for proper git-submodule handling, we would have to do
> (roughly):
>
> git clone blabla pkg-version
> cd pkg-version
> git checkout pkg-version
> git submodule update --init --recursive
> find . -name .git -exec rm -rf {} +
> cd ..
> tar czf DL_DIR/pkg-version.tar.gz pkg-version/
>
> This is not very complex, but is stil la significant change from our
> current git wrapper.
>
> And then, what about svn externals? About Hg subrepos? Does bzr also
> have such a thing?
>
> Note that I would not really mind doing such a change. But is it worth
> it, given that we currently have only one package that needs submodules?
> Or do we have others for which we had to "deal with it" in a crude way?
I don't want to go down this route for the moment, I'd prefer to see
how many of these git submodule users we have.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-19 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-07 16:50 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 0/3] New packages libglfw/cal3d/vsxu Bernd Kuhls
2015-11-07 16:50 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/3] package/libglfw: new package Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 13:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-11-07 16:50 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/3] package/cal3d: " Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 14:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-19 14:25 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-12-19 14:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-12-19 14:47 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-12-20 21:52 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-12-19 14:35 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-12-19 14:39 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-11-07 16:50 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 3/3] package/vsxu: " Bernd Kuhls
2015-12-19 14:43 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-12-19 15:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151219153519.38c52050@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox