Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/9 v2] linux: meddle not in the affairs of filesystems, for you are tasty with bacon
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:02:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160328210249.GC3608@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56F96E2C.9020606@gmail.com>

Romain, All,

On 2016-03-28 19:47 +0200, Romain Naour spake thusly:
> Le 28/03/2016 19:36, Romain Naour a ?crit :
> > Le 11/03/2016 19:41, Yann E. MORIN a ?crit :
> >> Currently, the rule to rebuild the Linux kernel with an initramfs
> >> directly depends on the filesystem image filename.
> >>
> >> This is inherently "bad" from a purity point of view. linux.mk should
> >> not have to delve into the fs internals.
> >>
> >> Rather, make it directly depend on the "frontal" rule that generates the
> >> cpio image.
> >>
> >> Drop the comment for linux-rebuild-with-initramfs, it was misleading
> >> (talking about generating "the initramfs list of files", which is not
> >> what was done, since we use a cpio as source of initramfs, not a list of
> >> files).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
> >> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> >> Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Changes v1 -> v2:
> >>   - drop intermediate, unneeded stamp-file
> >>   - drop misleading comment
> >>
> >> ---
> >> This, too, will be useful for the initramfs patch coming next.
> >> ---
> >>  linux/linux.mk | 16 ++++++----------
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/linux/linux.mk b/linux/linux.mk
> >> index ea90918..c0d760a 100644
> >> --- a/linux/linux.mk
> >> +++ b/linux/linux.mk
> >> @@ -438,11 +438,12 @@ endif # BR_BUILDING
> >>  $(eval $(kconfig-package))
> >>  
> >>  # Support for rebuilding the kernel after the cpio archive has
> >> -# been generated in $(BINARIES_DIR)/rootfs.cpio.
> >> -$(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt: $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_target_installed
> >> -$(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt: $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_images_installed
> >> -$(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt: $(BINARIES_DIR)/rootfs.cpio
> >> -$(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt:
> >> +# been generated.
> >> +.PHONY: linux-rebuild-with-initramfs
> >> +linux-rebuild-with-initramfs: $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_target_installed
> >> +linux-rebuild-with-initramfs: $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_images_installed
> >> +linux-rebuild-with-initramfs: rootfs-cpio
> >> +linux-rebuild-with-initramfs:
> >>  	@$(call MESSAGE,"Rebuilding kernel with initramfs")
> >>  	# Build the kernel.
> >>  	$(LINUX_MAKE_ENV) $(MAKE) $(LINUX_MAKE_FLAGS) -C $(@D) $(LINUX_TARGET_NAME)
> The issue can be fixed by using LINUX_DIR instead of @D.   ^^

Indeed. It is in my local branch, though. I wonder why it did not end up
in my tree, or why this patch does not have it... Weird...

Oh, I get it now... Damned. I should be more careful when I work on my
remote machine. So, because buildiong can take quite some time, I ssh
into a remote fast server for heavy builds. When there an issue, I
usually fix locally, then push the branch to the remote machine. Except,
I sometime forget that I'm remote, so I do the fixes remotely. And I can
forget to git-fetch those...

Damn...

Thanks! :-)

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

> Best regards,
> Romain
> 
> >> @@ -451,8 +452,3 @@ $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt:
> >>  	cp $(LINUX_IMAGE_PATH) $(BINARIES_DIR)
> >>  	# If there is a .ub file copy it to the final destination
> >>  	test ! -f $(LINUX_IMAGE_PATH).ub || cp $(LINUX_IMAGE_PATH).ub $(BINARIES_DIR)
> >> -	$(Q)touch $@
> > 
> > IIUC, the stamp file can be removed since the target is now PHONY, right ?
> > 
> > But latter in the patch 4/9 in the comment there is a reference to this file:
> > # Note: ordering of the dependencies is not guaranteed here, but in
> > # linux/linux.mk, via the .stamp_initramfs_rebuilt stamp file, which depends
> > # on the rootfs-cpio filesystem rule.
> > 
> >> -
> >> -# The initramfs building code must make sure this target gets called
> >> -# after it generated the initramfs list of files.
> >> -linux-rebuild-with-initramfs: $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt
> >>
> > 
> > Something is wrong...
> > With this patch applied, I have the following error when rebuilding the kernel
> > with initramfs:
> > 
> > make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'bzImage'. Arr?t.
> > linux/linux.mk:447: recipe for target 'linux-rebuild-with-initramfs' failed
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Romain
> > 
> 

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-28 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-11 18:41 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/9 v2] fs: cleanups and enhancements (branch yem/fs) Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/9 v2] core: sort packages and eliminate duplicates before building Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 16:29   ` Romain Naour
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/9 v2] linux: split overly-long dependency line for readability Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 16:31   ` Romain Naour
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/9 v2] linux: meddle not in the affairs of filesystems, for you are tasty with bacon Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 17:36   ` Romain Naour
2016-03-28 17:47     ` Romain Naour
2016-03-28 21:02       ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2016-03-28 21:05     ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/9 v2] fs/initramfs: cleanup and enhance comments Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 18:05   ` Romain Naour
2016-03-28 21:36     ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/9 v2] fs/ext2: use a post-gen hook rather than a post-target rule Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 18:13   ` Romain Naour
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/9 v2] fs/cpio: " Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 18:22   ` Romain Naour
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 7/9 v2] fs/common: get rid of post-target rules Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 18:26   ` Romain Naour
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 8/9 v2] fs/common: move actions common to all filesystems to their own rule Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 21:12   ` Romain Naour
2016-03-28 21:43     ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 9/9 v2] [RFC] core: finalise target in its own location Yann E. MORIN

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160328210249.GC3608@free.fr \
    --to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox