From: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/9 v2] linux: meddle not in the affairs of filesystems, for you are tasty with bacon
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 19:36:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F96B80.6040706@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cef8c3fc419c6ef806d18184cf9e53c4c7323e6.1457721607.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Hi Yann, All,
Le 11/03/2016 19:41, Yann E. MORIN a ?crit :
> Currently, the rule to rebuild the Linux kernel with an initramfs
> directly depends on the filesystem image filename.
>
> This is inherently "bad" from a purity point of view. linux.mk should
> not have to delve into the fs internals.
>
> Rather, make it directly depend on the "frontal" rule that generates the
> cpio image.
>
> Drop the comment for linux-rebuild-with-initramfs, it was misleading
> (talking about generating "the initramfs list of files", which is not
> what was done, since we use a cpio as source of initramfs, not a list of
> files).
>
> Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
>
> ---
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> - drop intermediate, unneeded stamp-file
> - drop misleading comment
>
> ---
> This, too, will be useful for the initramfs patch coming next.
> ---
> linux/linux.mk | 16 ++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux/linux.mk b/linux/linux.mk
> index ea90918..c0d760a 100644
> --- a/linux/linux.mk
> +++ b/linux/linux.mk
> @@ -438,11 +438,12 @@ endif # BR_BUILDING
> $(eval $(kconfig-package))
>
> # Support for rebuilding the kernel after the cpio archive has
> -# been generated in $(BINARIES_DIR)/rootfs.cpio.
> -$(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt: $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_target_installed
> -$(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt: $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_images_installed
> -$(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt: $(BINARIES_DIR)/rootfs.cpio
> -$(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt:
> +# been generated.
> +.PHONY: linux-rebuild-with-initramfs
> +linux-rebuild-with-initramfs: $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_target_installed
> +linux-rebuild-with-initramfs: $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_images_installed
> +linux-rebuild-with-initramfs: rootfs-cpio
> +linux-rebuild-with-initramfs:
> @$(call MESSAGE,"Rebuilding kernel with initramfs")
> # Build the kernel.
> $(LINUX_MAKE_ENV) $(MAKE) $(LINUX_MAKE_FLAGS) -C $(@D) $(LINUX_TARGET_NAME)
> @@ -451,8 +452,3 @@ $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt:
> cp $(LINUX_IMAGE_PATH) $(BINARIES_DIR)
> # If there is a .ub file copy it to the final destination
> test ! -f $(LINUX_IMAGE_PATH).ub || cp $(LINUX_IMAGE_PATH).ub $(BINARIES_DIR)
> - $(Q)touch $@
IIUC, the stamp file can be removed since the target is now PHONY, right ?
But latter in the patch 4/9 in the comment there is a reference to this file:
# Note: ordering of the dependencies is not guaranteed here, but in
# linux/linux.mk, via the .stamp_initramfs_rebuilt stamp file, which depends
# on the rootfs-cpio filesystem rule.
> -
> -# The initramfs building code must make sure this target gets called
> -# after it generated the initramfs list of files.
> -linux-rebuild-with-initramfs: $(LINUX_DIR)/.stamp_initramfs_rebuilt
>
Something is wrong...
With this patch applied, I have the following error when rebuilding the kernel
with initramfs:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'bzImage'. Arr?t.
linux/linux.mk:447: recipe for target 'linux-rebuild-with-initramfs' failed
Best regards,
Romain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-28 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-11 18:41 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/9 v2] fs: cleanups and enhancements (branch yem/fs) Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/9 v2] core: sort packages and eliminate duplicates before building Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 16:29 ` Romain Naour
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/9 v2] linux: split overly-long dependency line for readability Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 16:31 ` Romain Naour
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/9 v2] linux: meddle not in the affairs of filesystems, for you are tasty with bacon Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 17:36 ` Romain Naour [this message]
2016-03-28 17:47 ` Romain Naour
2016-03-28 21:02 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 21:05 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/9 v2] fs/initramfs: cleanup and enhance comments Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 18:05 ` Romain Naour
2016-03-28 21:36 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/9 v2] fs/ext2: use a post-gen hook rather than a post-target rule Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 18:13 ` Romain Naour
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/9 v2] fs/cpio: " Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 18:22 ` Romain Naour
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 7/9 v2] fs/common: get rid of post-target rules Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 18:26 ` Romain Naour
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 8/9 v2] fs/common: move actions common to all filesystems to their own rule Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-28 21:12 ` Romain Naour
2016-03-28 21:43 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-03-11 18:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 9/9 v2] [RFC] core: finalise target in its own location Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F96B80.6040706@gmail.com \
--to=romain.naour@gmail.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox