From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] openzwave: new package
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:25:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425092535.3c606c2a@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4485_1461568414_571DC39E_4485_77_1_EEB3FED4859B6C488DDDEC4B2D3DE92B0FC5BBD4@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Hello,
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:13:34 +0000, fabrice.fontaine at orange.com wrote:
> I will fix all the issues and send a new patch by the end of the day.
Great, thanks!
> Concerning the email address, my contribution has been validated
> internally by Orange but I can use my personal email address to send
> the new patch if needed because I can't remove the footer added by
> the mail server.
I am not sure how much strict we (the Buildroot community) want to be
regarding such confidentiality footers. After all, it only says "may
contain confidential or privileged information", which means that it
may also contain public information. I'm not sure what other
open-source projects are doing? Apparently at
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-December/050573.html,
the Linux MTD maintainer rejected a patch due to a confidentiality
footer.
Peter, Arnout, Yann, what's your position on this?
(http://www.economist.com/node/18529895 is an interesting article on
the matter, probably useful to share with the relevant folks in
Orange :-))
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-22 14:20 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] openzwave: new package fabrice.fontaine at orange.com
2016-04-22 22:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
[not found] ` <4485_1461568414_571DC39E_4485_77_1_EEB3FED4859B6C488DDDEC4B2D3DE92B0FC5BBD4@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
2016-04-25 7:25 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2016-04-25 12:44 ` Peter Korsgaard
2016-04-25 14:31 ` fabrice.fontaine at orange.com
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-22 13:37 fabrice.fontaine at orange.com
2016-04-20 13:38 Joris Lijssens
2016-04-21 14:12 ` Julien Boibessot
2016-04-22 9:56 ` Joris Lijssens
2016-03-04 15:15 fabrice.fontaine at orange.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160425092535.3c606c2a@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox