From: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v7] gtest/gmock: bump to version 1.8.0
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:34:24 -0300 (BRT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201605192.12649135.1488454464199.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.ind.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170301230927.11de82b6@free-electrons.com>
> From: "Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> To: "Carlos Santos" <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
> Cc: "Fabrice Fontaine" <fabrice.fontaine@orange.com>, "Romain Naour" <romain.naour@gmail.com>, "Yann E. MORIN"
> <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>, buildroot at buildroot.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 7:09:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v7] gtest/gmock: bump to version 1.8.0
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:31:50 -0300 (BRT), Carlos Santos wrote:
>
>> Because it does not work (try http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/727786/).
>
> Could you define "does not work" ? Indeed, I applied this version of
> your patch (v6), and built it with the following configurations:
>
> BR2_PACKAGE_GTEST=y
> # BR2_PACKAGE_GTEST_GMOCK is not set
>
> and:
>
> BR2_PACKAGE_GTEST=y
> BR2_PACKAGE_GTEST_GMOCK=y
>
> and both built successfully.
Hum, that's correct. I'm at work now, without access to the machine in
which I was running my tests, at home, and can't reproduce the problem
that led me to believe that v7 was necessary. Looks like it was just a
mistake.
Please apply v6 and discard v7. Sorry for the noise.
--
Carlos Santos (Casantos) - DATACOM, P&D
?The greatest triumph that modern PR can offer is the transcendent
success of having your words and actions judged by your reputation,
rather than the other way about.? ? Christopher Hitchens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-07 14:39 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] gtest: bump to version 1.8.0 Fabrice Fontaine
2016-09-07 15:19 ` Carlos Santos
2016-09-07 22:20 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] gtest/gmock: " Carlos Santos
2016-09-07 23:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] " Carlos Santos
2016-09-11 12:09 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-02-06 15:43 ` Romain Naour
2017-02-06 16:46 ` Carlos Santos
2017-02-06 16:54 ` Romain Naour
2017-02-11 11:32 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] " Carlos Santos
2017-02-11 13:50 ` Romain Naour
2017-02-11 18:08 ` Carlos Santos
2017-02-11 18:11 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4] " Carlos Santos
2017-02-12 12:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v5] " Carlos Santos
2017-02-12 14:15 ` Romain Naour
2017-02-12 14:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-12 14:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-12 15:02 ` Carlos Santos
2017-02-12 17:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-14 11:05 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v6] " Carlos Santos
2017-02-22 17:27 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7] " Carlos Santos
2017-02-26 14:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-27 12:31 ` Carlos Santos
2017-03-01 22:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-03-02 11:34 ` Carlos Santos [this message]
2017-03-05 21:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v6] " Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201605192.12649135.1488454464199.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.ind.br \
--to=casantos@datacom.ind.br \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox