Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Reiserfsprogs
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:18:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160628181846.25cc7912@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F9C551623D2CBB4C9488801D14F864C6EE83116F@ex-mb1.corp.adtran.com>

Hello,

Thanks for this patch. See my review below.

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:46:26 +0000, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
> 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
> This patch was attempted earlier by Rod Boyce:
> 
> All,
> 
> Attached is a patch that adds reiserfsprogs to build root.
> 
> Regards,
> Rod Boyce
> Index: package/Config.in
> 
> I have tweaked it to make it fit into the latest git repo.
> 
> This patch adds support for reiserfsprogs.

All of this commit log is not appropriate. It should just be:

reiserfsprogs: new package

and pretty much nothing else, except if you have other comments to add
about the package. Remember that the commit log stays forever in the
Git history of the project, so we don't need the "All, Attached is a
patch ....".

> 
> Signed-off-by:  Andy Kennedy <andy.kennedy@adtran.com>

I am not sure your patch has been formatted using Git. Please use "git
format-patch" to format your patch, and then "git send-email" to send
it.

> diff -Naur a/package/reiserfsprogs/Config.in b/package/reiserfsprogs/Config.in
> --- a/package/reiserfsprogs/Config.in	1969-12-31 18:00:00.000000000 -0600
> +++ b/package/reiserfsprogs/Config.in	2016-06-24 14:03:06.000000000 -0500
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +

Unnecessary empty line.

> +config BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS
> +	bool "reiserfsprogs"
> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_ACL
> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX
> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LIBBLKID

This dependency is not needed. reiserfsprogs doesn't use libblkid
directly.

> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LIBUUID
> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS

Alphabetic ordering would be better.

> +	help
> +	  The reiserfs file system utilities.
> +
> +	  https://reiser4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
> +
> +if BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS
> +
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_MKREISERFS
> +	bool "mkreiserfs"
> +	default y
> +
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_REISERFSCK
> +	bool "reiserfsck"
> +	default y
> +
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_RESIZE_REISERFS
> +	bool "resize_reiserfs"
> +	default y
> +
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_REISERFSTUNE
> +	bool "reiserfstune"
> +	default y
> +
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_DEBUGREISERFS
> +	bool "debugreiserfs"
> +	default y

Please remove all those sub-options, the size of each binary is not big
enough to justify having sub-options:

lrwxrwxrwx 1 thomas thomas     13 juin  28 18:12 output/target/usr/sbin/debugfs.reiserfs -> debugreiserfs
-rwxr-xr-x 1 thomas thomas  63372 juin  28 18:12 output/target/usr/sbin/debugreiserfs
lrwxrwxrwx 1 thomas thomas     10 juin  28 18:12 output/target/usr/sbin/fsck.reiserfs -> reiserfsck
lrwxrwxrwx 1 thomas thomas     10 juin  28 18:12 output/target/usr/sbin/mkfs.reiserfs -> mkreiserfs
-rwxr-xr-x 1 thomas thomas  17248 juin  28 18:12 output/target/usr/sbin/mkreiserfs
-rwxr-xr-x 1 thomas thomas 151456 juin  28 18:12 output/target/usr/sbin/reiserfsck
-rwxr-xr-x 1 thomas thomas  16580 juin  28 18:12 output/target/usr/sbin/reiserfstune
-rwxr-xr-x 1 thomas thomas  16748 juin  28 18:12 output/target/usr/sbin/resize_reiserfs
lrwxrwxrwx 1 thomas thomas     12 juin  28 18:12 output/target/usr/sbin/tunefs.reiserfs -> reiserfstune

> diff -Naur a/package/reiserfsprogs/Config.in.host b/package/reiserfsprogs/Config.in.host
> --- a/package/reiserfsprogs/Config.in.host	1969-12-31 18:00:00.000000000 -0600
> +++ b/package/reiserfsprogs/Config.in.host	2016-06-24 14:04:44.000000000 -0500
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_REISERFSPROGS
> +	bool "host reiserfsprogs"
> +	help
> +	  The reiserfs file system utilities.
> +
> +	  https://reiser4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page

I don't think it is useful to have a host variant for reiserfsprogs,
except if you add support to generate a root filesystem image using
reiserfs. But since that's a separate effort, I would suggest to just
drop the host variant of the package for now.

> diff -Naur a/package/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs.mk b/package/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs.mk
> --- a/package/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs.mk	1969-12-31 18:00:00.000000000 -0600
> +++ b/package/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs.mk	2016-06-24 14:04:20.000000000 -0500
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +################################################################################
> +#
> +# reiserfsprogs
> +#
> +################################################################################
> +
> +REISERFSPROGS_VERSION = 3.6.25
> +REISERFSPROGS_SITE = ftp://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jeffm/reiserfsprogs/v$(REISERFSPROGS_VERSION)

Please use http:// instead of ftp://.

> +REISERFSPROGS_LICENSE = GPLv2

The license is not exactly GPLv2. It is, according to the README file:

"""
ReiserFSprogs is hereby licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2
but with the following "Anti-Plagiarism" modification
"""

So, you should probably use:

REISERFSPROGS_LICENSE = GPLv2 with exceptions


> +REISERFSPROGS_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING README
> +REISERFSPROGS_CONF_ENV = LIBS='-lcom_err -luuid -lpthread -lrt'

This line is not needed.

> +REISERFSPROGS_DEPENDENCIES = util-linux e2fsprogs acl

Alphabetic ordering is preferred.

> +
> +# binaries to keep or remove
> +REISERFSPROGS_BINTARGETS_$(BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_MKREISERFS) += usr/local/sbin/mkreiserfs
> +REISERFSPROGS_BINTARGETS_$(BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_MKREISERFS) += usr/local/sbin/mkfs.reiserfs
> +REISERFSPROGS_BINTARGETS_$(BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_REISERFSCK) += usr/local/sbin/reiserfsck
> +REISERFSPROGS_BINTARGETS_$(BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_REISERFSCK) += usr/local/sbin/fsck.reiserfs
> +REISERFSPROGS_BINTARGETS_$(BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_RESIZE_REISERFS) += usr/local/sbin/resize_reiserfs
> +REISERFSPROGS_BINTARGETS_$(BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_REISERFSTUNE) += usr/local/sbin/reiserfstune
> +REISERFSPROGS_BINTARGETS_$(BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_REISERFSTUNE) += usr/local/sbin/tunefs.reiserfs
> +REISERFSPROGS_BINTARGETS_$(BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_DEBUGREISERFS) += usr/local/sbin/debugreiserfs
> +REISERFSPROGS_BINTARGETS_$(BR2_PACKAGE_REISERFSPROGS_DEBUGREISERFS) += usr/local/sbin/debugfs.reiserfs

All those lines are useless, there is nothing installed in
usr/local/sbin, everything is installed in usr/sbin. Also, as per my
suggestion to drop the sub-options, those lines are in fact not
necessary.

> +
> +define REISERFSPROGS_TARGET_REMOVE_UNNEEDED
> +	rm -f $(addprefix $(TARGET_DIR)/, $(REISERFSPROGS_BINTARGETS_))
> +endef
> +
> +REISERFSPROGS_POST_INSTALL_TARGET_HOOKS += REISERFSPROGS_TARGET_REMOVE_UNNEEDED
> +
> +$(eval $(autotools-package))
> +$(eval $(host-autotools-package))

And drop this last line, since the host variant is probably not useful.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-28 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-27 18:46 [Buildroot] [PATCH] Reiserfsprogs ANDY KENNEDY
2016-06-27 19:03 ` ANDY KENNEDY
2016-06-28 16:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2016-06-28 19:49   ` ANDY KENNEDY
2016-06-29 10:04     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-29 18:20       ` ANDY KENNEDY
2016-06-29 21:05         ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160628181846.25cc7912@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox