* [Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: fix bfin problem
@ 2016-07-31 8:26 Waldemar Brodkorb
2016-08-05 19:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Waldemar Brodkorb @ 2016-07-31 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Fix for LINKER BUG: .rofixup section size mismatch problems.
Bug was already reported by Stuart Henderson to binutils upstream:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
Fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d5999ae91a1f4dee3d01a0bbc3d8a4c5939ad175/
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/17232204249aeb04150ac43a2424aa26a6b6c807/
Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
---
package/binutils/2.26.1/0905-bfin-rofixup-bug.patch | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 package/binutils/2.26.1/0905-bfin-rofixup-bug.patch
diff --git a/package/binutils/2.26.1/0905-bfin-rofixup-bug.patch b/package/binutils/2.26.1/0905-bfin-rofixup-bug.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..da9d586
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/binutils/2.26.1/0905-bfin-rofixup-bug.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+Fixes: LINKER BUG: .rofixup section size mismatch
+
+Workaround from adi-toolchain commit:
+af414ec1fb628ddb1562f062f3db49823ca14ca2
+[#6798] binutils-2.21/bfd: temp workaround for rofixup mismatch errors.
+
+Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
+
+diff -Nur binutils-2.26.1.orig/bfd/elf32-bfin.c binutils-2.26.1/bfd/elf32-bfin.c
+--- binutils-2.26.1.orig/bfd/elf32-bfin.c 2015-11-13 09:27:40.000000000 +0100
++++ binutils-2.26.1/bfd/elf32-bfin.c 2016-07-31 00:50:48.357995132 +0200
+@@ -4879,7 +4879,8 @@
+
+ case R_BFIN_FUNCDESC:
+ picrel->fd++;
+- picrel->relocsfd++;
++ if (bfd_get_section_flags (abfd, sec) & SEC_ALLOC)
++ picrel->relocsfd++;
+ break;
+
+ /* This relocation describes the C++ object vtable hierarchy.
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: fix bfin problem
2016-07-31 8:26 [Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: fix bfin problem Waldemar Brodkorb
@ 2016-08-05 19:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-05 19:22 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2016-08-05 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello,
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:26:20 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Fix for LINKER BUG: .rofixup section size mismatch problems.
>
> Bug was already reported by Stuart Henderson to binutils upstream:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
The bug dates back from 2011, and nobody cared. Does this mean that we
will have to carry this "temporary workaround" forever in Buildroot?
I've applied your patch, but I must say I'm not too happy to see this
kind of things being added :-/
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: fix bfin problem
2016-08-05 19:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2016-08-05 19:22 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2016-08-05 19:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Waldemar Brodkorb @ 2016-08-05 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote,
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:26:20 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > Fix for LINKER BUG: .rofixup section size mismatch problems.
> >
> > Bug was already reported by Stuart Henderson to binutils upstream:
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
>
> The bug dates back from 2011, and nobody cared. Does this mean that we
> will have to carry this "temporary workaround" forever in Buildroot?
>
> I've applied your patch, but I must say I'm not too happy to see this
> kind of things being added :-/
>
> Thanks,
I am subscribed to binutils/gcc mailinglists and managed to already
get some simple bugfixes added. But the times to get fixes in, might
take some time.
best regards
Waldemar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: fix bfin problem
2016-08-05 19:22 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
@ 2016-08-05 19:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2016-08-05 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello,
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 21:22:37 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> I am subscribed to binutils/gcc mailinglists and managed to already
> get some simple bugfixes added. But the times to get fixes in, might
> take some time.
I am not worried at all if things take time. Even if it takes 6 or 12
months, that's fine.
What worries me if it *never* gets fixed, because nobody works on it.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-05 19:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-07-31 8:26 [Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: fix bfin problem Waldemar Brodkorb
2016-08-05 19:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-05 19:22 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2016-08-05 19:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox