From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] ltp-testsuite: bump to version 20160920
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 23:37:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161003233743.5cae3f1f@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475322624-20518-2-git-send-email-nunes.erico@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Sat, 1 Oct 2016 13:50:23 +0200, Erico Nunes wrote:
> Patch 0001-fix-uClibc-build.patch is now part of upstream so it is not
> needed in Buildroot anymore. The remaining patches were just rebased and
> then renumbered so that they apply cleanly to this new version.
>
> This has been build-tested with both glibc and uClibc toolchains and
> run-tested on x86_64 and aarch64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@gmail.com>
Applied to master, thanks!
> I wonder if we should really maintain the uClibc-related patches given
> that even the patches themselves mention that they are not upstreamable.
> This feels a bit like maintaining feature patches. If upstream adds more
> changes that break uClibc, we would need to maintain that ourselves.
> I'm interested in maintaining this package but if it turns out that it
> eventually starts breaking for uClibc in future versions, I'd vote for
> removing uClibc support for it.
I looked at the remaining patches:
- 0001 I'm not sure to fully understand
- 0002 and 0002 are just missing features in uClibc, I don't see why
those patches can't be upstreamed. Waldemar, maybe you could help?
- 0004 fixes an issue that also occurs with libtirpc, so it definitely
should be upstreamable
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-03 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-01 11:50 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] ltp-testsuite: change install prefix Erico Nunes
2016-10-01 11:50 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] ltp-testsuite: bump to version 20160920 Erico Nunes
2016-10-03 21:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2016-10-08 4:14 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2016-10-01 11:50 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] ltp-testsuite: make Config.in libc comment standard Erico Nunes
2016-10-03 21:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-10-03 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] ltp-testsuite: change install prefix Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161003233743.5cae3f1f@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox