From: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] ltp-testsuite: bump to version 20160920
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 06:14:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161008041431.GO2052@waldemar-brodkorb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475322624-20518-2-git-send-email-nunes.erico@gmail.com>
Hi Erico,
Erico Nunes wrote,
> Patch 0001-fix-uClibc-build.patch is now part of upstream so it is not
> needed in Buildroot anymore. The remaining patches were just rebased and
> then renumbered so that they apply cleanly to this new version.
>
> This has been build-tested with both glibc and uClibc toolchains and
> run-tested on x86_64 and aarch64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> I wonder if we should really maintain the uClibc-related patches given
> that even the patches themselves mention that they are not upstreamable.
> This feels a bit like maintaining feature patches. If upstream adds more
> changes that break uClibc, we would need to maintain that ourselves.
> I'm interested in maintaining this package but if it turns out that it
> eventually starts breaking for uClibc in future versions, I'd vote for
> removing uClibc support for it.
No, I disagree here. The patches for uClibc are upstreamable.
Only the libtirpc patch has the comment and this is related to
features missing in uClibc and musl. (DES)
If more ltp tests should break and you want to maintain the package
please work with me and LTP people to get things working.
Compiling and running LTP with uClibc-ng is an important part of
getting missing features or bugs fixed.
It is not an option to disable the package for uClibc-ng.
This worked fine in the past, see exp10 related issues.
best regards
Waldemar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-08 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-01 11:50 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] ltp-testsuite: change install prefix Erico Nunes
2016-10-01 11:50 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] ltp-testsuite: bump to version 20160920 Erico Nunes
2016-10-03 21:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-10-08 4:14 ` Waldemar Brodkorb [this message]
2016-10-01 11:50 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] ltp-testsuite: make Config.in libc comment standard Erico Nunes
2016-10-03 21:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-10-03 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] ltp-testsuite: change install prefix Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161008041431.GO2052@waldemar-brodkorb.de \
--to=wbx@openadk.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox