[Buildroot] qmx6_defconfig fails to build

[Buildroot] qmx6_defconfig fails to build

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Stephan, J?r?me, Gary,

All of you have touched the qmx6_defconfig in Buildroot: Stephan is the
original submitter (in 2014), J?r?me did some improvements in April
2015, and then Gary updated the kernel version two times in 2015.

However, today, this defconfig fails to build, because the U-Boot
version being used is too old to build with gcc 5.x.

If you still have access to the HW, could you submit a patch that
updates the defconfig to make it build with gcc 5.x ?

See the full build log at
http://free-electrons.com/~thomas/pub/buildroot-defconfigs/qmx6_defconfig.log.FAIL.

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[Buildroot] qmx6_defconfig fails to build

[Stephan Hoffmann]

Hello Thomas,

unfortunatelly, I do not have access to a qmx6 hardware anymore.

Kind regards

Stephan

Am 05.11.2016 um 15:04 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni:
> Stephan, J?r?me, Gary,
>
> All of you have touched the qmx6_defconfig in Buildroot: Stephan is the
> original submitter (in 2014), J?r?me did some improvements in April
> 2015, and then Gary updated the kernel version two times in 2015.
>
> However, today, this defconfig fails to build, because the U-Boot
> version being used is too old to build with gcc 5.x.
>
> If you still have access to the HW, could you submit a patch that
> updates the defconfig to make it build with gcc 5.x ?
>
> See the full build log at
> http://free-electrons.com/~thomas/pub/buildroot-defconfigs/qmx6_defconfig.log.FAIL.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Thomas


-- 
reLinux     -    Stephan Hoffmann
Am Schmidtgrund 124    50765 K?ln
Tel. +49.221.95595-19    Fax: -64
www.reLinux.de Stephan at reLinux.de

[Buildroot] qmx6_defconfig fails to build

[Gary Bisson]

Hi Thomas, all,

Same here, don't have any qmx6 hardware. I've bumped the kernel in the past
looking at their repo tags but I think they now moved to another repo.

Regards,
Gary

Le 5 nov. 2016 3:58 PM, "Stephan Hoffmann" <sho@relinux.de> a ?crit :

Hello Thomas,

unfortunatelly, I do not have access to a qmx6 hardware anymore.

Kind regards

Stephan

Am 05.11.2016 um 15:04 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni:
> Stephan, J?r?me, Gary,
>
> All of you have touched the qmx6_defconfig in Buildroot: Stephan is the
> original submitter (in 2014), J?r?me did some improvements in April
> 2015, and then Gary updated the kernel version two times in 2015.
>
> However, today, this defconfig fails to build, because the U-Boot
> version being used is too old to build with gcc 5.x.
>
> If you still have access to the HW, could you submit a patch that
> updates the defconfig to make it build with gcc 5.x ?
>
> See the full build log at
> http://free-electrons.com/~thomas/pub/buildroot-
defconfigs/qmx6_defconfig.log.FAIL.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Thomas


--
reLinux     -    Stephan Hoffmann
Am Schmidtgrund 124    50765 K?ln
Tel. +49.221.95595-19    Fax: -64
www.reLinux.de Stephan at reLinux.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20161106/e122874c/attachment.html>

[Buildroot] qmx6_defconfig fails to build

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 13:07:33 +0100, Gary Bisson wrote:

> Same here, don't have any qmx6 hardware. I've bumped the kernel in the past
> looking at their repo tags but I think they now moved to another repo.

OK, so unless J?r?me has access to the HW and gets back to us, I'll
propose to remove this defconfig.

Thanks for the feedback,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[Buildroot] qmx6_defconfig fails to build

[Jérôme Pouiller]

Hello,

On Sunday 06 November 2016 13:09:54 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 13:07:33 +0100, Gary Bisson wrote:
> > Same here, don't have any qmx6 hardware. I've bumped the kernel in
> > the past looking at their repo tags but I think they now moved to
> > another repo.
> OK, so unless J?r?me has access to the HW and gets back to us, I'll
> propose to remove this defconfig.

I have this board somewhere. However, I don't actively work on it and 
honestly I won't have time to do runtime tests. I agree to drop this 
defconfig.

BR,

-- 
J?r?me Pouiller, Sysmic
Embedded Linux specialist
http://www.sysmic.fr