* [Buildroot] IASL Support in BuildRoot?
@ 2017-05-15 17:24 Alistair Francis
2017-05-15 19:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alistair Francis @ 2017-05-15 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
+ BuildRoot mailing list
Change the subject, was: [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results
for 2017-05-01
This is failing because the host doesn't have iasl (from the
acpi-tools package).
I looked at BuildRoot and it supports building this for the target,
but no host support. What is the usual process here? Do we add it as a
host requirement or do we add support to build it?
Thanks,
Alistair
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Petazzoni [mailto:thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com]
> Sent: Monday, 1 May 2017 11:28 PM
> To: Alistair Francis <alistai@xilinx.com>
> Subject: [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2017-05-0
>
> Hello,
>
> This is the list of Buildroot build failures that occured on
> 2017-05-01, and for which you are a registered architecture developer
> or package developer. Please help us improving the quality of
> Buildroot by investigating those build failures and sending patches to
> fix them. Thanks!
>
> Build failures related to your packages:
>
> aarch64 | xen-4.8.1 |
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/afa199864d6b546fe759bb582a9c10702ea7fa
> 78
>
> --
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] IASL Support in BuildRoot?
2017-05-15 17:24 [Buildroot] IASL Support in BuildRoot? Alistair Francis
@ 2017-05-15 19:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2017-05-15 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello,
On Mon, 15 May 2017 10:24:47 -0700, Alistair Francis wrote:
> + BuildRoot mailing list
> Change the subject, was: [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results
> for 2017-05-01
>
> This is failing because the host doesn't have iasl (from the
> acpi-tools package).
>
> I looked at BuildRoot and it supports building this for the target,
> but no host support. What is the usual process here? Do we add it as a
> host requirement or do we add support to build it?
Adding support to build it is our normal way of solving this type of
dependency.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-15 19:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-15 17:24 [Buildroot] IASL Support in BuildRoot? Alistair Francis
2017-05-15 19:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox