From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/7] support/testing: add test of BR2_CCACHE with an external toolchain
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:01:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170710180105.44fa823a@windsurf.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170709232123.30120-6-arnout@mind.be>
Hello,
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 01:21:21 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle
(Essensium/Mind) wrote:
> We piggy-back on an existing test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
> ---
> support/testing/tests/toolchain/test_external.py | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/support/testing/tests/toolchain/test_external.py b/support/testing/tests/toolchain/test_external.py
> index afb4bb0b50..c315ef8055 100644
> --- a/support/testing/tests/toolchain/test_external.py
> +++ b/support/testing/tests/toolchain/test_external.py
> @@ -207,9 +207,13 @@ BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_CXX=y
> self.emulator.login()
>
> class TestExternalToolchainBuildrootuClibc(TestExternalToolchain):
> + # On this test we piggy-back a test of BR2_CCACHE in combination
> + # with an external toolchain.
I'm not sure I'm a big fan of "hijacking" an existing test to validate
ccache. Shouldn't we have a separate test for that, clearly identified
as being ccache related?
Could be a test that inherits from this one, and simply adds more
options. But at least in case of failure it will be clearly identified
as a CCache related test in the Gitlab CI results.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-09 23:21 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/7] More HOST_DIR/usr fixes Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-09 23:21 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/7] Makefile: properly create $(HOST_DIR)/usr compatibility symlink Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 15:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-09 23:21 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/7] toolchain-wrapper: remove remaining references to HOST_DIR/usr Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 15:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-09 23:21 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/7] support/testing: strip /usr/ part from HOST_DIR Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 15:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-09 23:21 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/7] support/testing: move BRTest initialisation to __init__ Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 15:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-09 23:21 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/7] support/testing: add test of BR2_CCACHE with an external toolchain Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 16:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-07-10 20:10 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-09 23:21 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/7] Makefile: add check that $(HOST_DIR)/usr is not a directory Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 16:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-10 16:12 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-10 19:51 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 20:09 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 21:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-10 21:36 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 21:43 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-09 23:21 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 7/7] toolchain-external: default BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PATH to empty Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 16:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170710180105.44fa823a@windsurf.lan \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox