From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4 v3] package/kvm-unit-tests: introduce _ARCH_SUPPORTS
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 23:57:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170710215748.GD22898@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170710234741.554c7a44@windsurf.lan>
Thomas, All,
On 2017-07-10 23:47 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:20:56 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > > What about the x86_64 dependency on a host compiler >= 4.5 ?
> > In the manual, it is said that one should not add a comment about a
> > dependency on the host toolchain...
>
> The manual says one thing, reality says another:
>
> package/collectd/Config.in:comment "write_prometheus needs a toolchain w/ C++, host gcc >= 4.5"
> package/cppcms/Config.in:comment "icu support needs a toolchain w/ gcc >= 4.8, host gcc >= 4.8"
> package/icu/Config.in:comment "icu needs a toolchain w/ C++, wchar, threads, gcc >= 4.8, host gcc >= 4.8"
> package/kodi/Config.in:comment "kodi needs python w/ .py modules, a uClibc or glibc toolchain w/ C++, locale, threads, wchar, dynamic library, gcc >= 4.8, host gcc >= 4.6"
> package/mfgtools/Config.in.host:comment "mfgtools needs host gcc >= 4.8"
> package/midori/Config.in:comment "midori needs libgtk3 and a glibc toolchain w/ C++, gcc >= 4.9, host gcc >= 4.8"
> package/php/Config.ext:comment "intl support needs a toolchain w/ C++, wchar, threads, gcc >= 4.8, host gcc >= 4.8"
> package/protobuf-c/Config.in:comment "protobuf-c needs a toolchain w/ C++, threads, host gcc >= 4.5"
> package/python-mwscrape2slob/Config.in:comment "python-mwscrape2slob needs a toolchain w/ C++, gcc >= 4.8, host gcc >= 4.8"
> package/python-pyicu/Config.in:comment "python-pyicu needs a toolchain w/ C++, gcc >= 4.8, host gcc >= 4.8"
> package/python-slob/Config.in:comment "python-slob needs a toolchain w/ C++, gcc >= 4.8, host gcc >= 4.8"
> package/qt5/qt5base/Config.in:comment "icu support needs a toolchain w/ gcc >= 4.8, host gcc >= 4.8"
> package/qt5/qt5webkit/Config.in:comment "qt5webkit needs a toolchain w/ dynamic library, gcc >= 4.8, host gcc >= 4.8"
> package/riemann-c-client/Config.in:comment "riemann-c-client needs a toolchain w/ C++, threads, host gcc >= 4.5"
> package/webkitgtk/Config.in:comment "webkitgtk needs libgtk3 and a glibc toolchain w/ C++, gcc >= 4.9, host gcc >= 4.8"
>
> I'm not sure why we would not add Config.in comment for dependencies on
> the host toolchain. What's the reasoning for *not* adding such
> dependencies ?
Because there is not much a user can do about the toolchain on host host
machine?
As much as it is "possible" to change the version for the cross-gcc, the
native compiler is often not replaceable. This is most probably the case
on enterprise-grade servers, where users are not root (and are stuck
with a precambrian host compiler)...
I wrote the comment, checked the manual for the template, then removed
the comment. Oh well, here it is again, then:
comment "kvm-unit-tests needs a host gcc >= 4.5"
depends on BR2_x86_64
depends on !BR2_HOST_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_5
Hehe! ;-)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-09 9:29 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4 v3] arch/arm: introduce big.LITTLE configurations Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-09 9:29 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4 v3] arch/arm: fix -mcpu default values for AArch64 Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-10 16:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-10 16:18 ` Tomov, Pavel
2017-07-10 16:22 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-19 13:59 ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-07-09 9:29 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4 v3] package/kvm-unit-tests: introduce _ARCH_SUPPORTS Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-10 16:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-10 16:20 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-10 19:56 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 20:10 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-10 20:12 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-10 20:19 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-10 21:47 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-10 21:57 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2017-07-11 21:14 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-07-22 21:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-22 21:49 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-09 9:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4 v3] arch/arm: add big.LITTLE cpu variants Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-22 21:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-09 9:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4 v3] package/kvm-unit-test: available for big.LITTLE arm cores too Yann E. MORIN
2017-07-22 21:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-07-22 21:50 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170710215748.GD22898@scaer \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox