Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2017-10-30
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 14:40:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101144041.05df6b0b@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHXCMMKsPg-DZW385VWMgUQmtngB_L9ALJqJiuZPj2Oz9g0uJQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:17:33 +0100, Samuel Martin wrote:

> >>     mips64el |                opencv-2.4.13.3 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b27d324331f6e351e95dd4742f4d0a50af60c590 |
> >>     mips64el |                opencv-2.4.13.3 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/44ed0be0bd94028b7b37e7bf21233adc1753d94b |  
> >
> > CMake Error at cmake/OpenCVCompilerOptions.cmake:21 (else):
> >   A duplicate ELSE command was found inside an IF block.
> > Call Stack (most recent call first):
> >   CMakeLists.txt:437 (include)
> >
> > Should be easy to fix. Samuel, do you think you will find some time to
> > have a look at this?  
> 
> I was about to check on these failures when the abo were off for
> maintainance yesterday.
> Hopefully I should have time to look into this by the end of the week.

Thanks!

> >>         bfin |                 openobex-1.7.2 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/78e033fe9f43845581a5d87b21a8451f67520e44 |  
> >
> > /usr/lfs/v0/rc-buildroot-test/scripts/instance-2/output/build/openobex-1.7.2/lib/obex_transport_sock.c:(.text+0x5f6): undefined reference to `accept4'
> >
> > Not sure what's going on. accept4() not wired in Linux or uClibc for
> > Blackfin? Something else? Waldemar, could you have a look?
> 
> I have a pending patch for openobex,.
> It seems accept4 is not available in uclibc for blackfin architecture [1].
> Grepping at the git log, similar issues were fixed by disabling the
> package on blackfin target.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> [1] https://cgit.openadk.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/tree/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/bits/kernel-features.h#n452

This is weird, because even major architectures like ARM are not listed
as part of the architectures that have accept4. But I don't even see
this __ASSUME_ACCEPT4 used anywhere.

Waldmear ?

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-01 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-31  7:00 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2017-10-30 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-31 22:05 ` [Buildroot] Analysis of build " Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-01  2:37   ` Matthew Weber
2017-11-01  9:45     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-01 10:01       ` Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-01 10:24         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-01 10:31           ` Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-02  2:31           ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-11-02  8:06             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-01 13:24       ` Matthew Weber
2017-11-01 13:37         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-01 10:17   ` Samuel Martin
2017-11-01 13:40     ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-11-01 18:03   ` Baruch Siach
2017-11-02 10:54     ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-03 22:31       ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-02 10:46   ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-02 17:43   ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-11-02 18:08     ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-11-02 20:04     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-02 20:55       ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-11-02 22:21   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-02 22:30     ` Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-03 11:17     ` Angelo Compagnucci
2017-11-03 13:38       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-03 13:46         ` Angelo Compagnucci
2017-11-03 13:52           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-03 14:18             ` Angelo Compagnucci
2017-11-03 14:28               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-03 14:35                 ` Angelo Compagnucci
2017-11-03 14:41                   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-04 22:18     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-04 22:20       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-04 22:36         ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-05 14:40           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-05 19:36             ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-05 22:35               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-09 20:58       ` Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-02 22:22   ` Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-08 12:49   ` Johan Oudinet
2017-11-08 16:16     ` Matthew Weber
2017-11-08 17:33       ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-11-08 19:35         ` Matthew Weber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171101144041.05df6b0b@windsurf \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox