From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] docs: update DEVELOPERS modification process
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 23:14:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171104231427.3b3f436a@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171104185305.5vkjjg6iwrhctcis@tarshish>
Hello,
On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 20:53:05 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > diff --git a/docs/manual/contribute.txt b/docs/manual/contribute.txt
> > index a58945f395..8bbc2b9eb7 100644
> > --- a/docs/manual/contribute.txt
> > +++ b/docs/manual/contribute.txt
> > @@ -260,9 +260,9 @@ options that no longer exist or are no longer needed.
> >
> > If you are interested in getting notified of build failures and of
> > further changes in the packages you added or modified, please add
> > -yourself to the DEVELOPERS file. This should be done in a separate
> > -patch of the series. See xref:DEVELOPERS[the DEVELOPERS file] for more
> > -information.
> > +yourself to the DEVELOPERS file. This should be done in the same patch
> > +creating or modifying the package. See xref:DEVELOPERS[the DEVELOPERS file]
> > +for more information.
>
> Not sure about "or modifying". Mixing a DEVELOPERS update into a random
> package update does not always make sense. The manual only refers to new
> packages/boards. I suggest to drop this sentence entirely, and leave the
> details for the manual.
Joseph is modifying the manual here, so I'm not sure what your last
sentence means.
However, I agree that doing the DEVELOPERS change in a patch just
modifying the package is perhaps not desirable. When adding a new
package, yes, definitely, the DEVELOPERS entry should be added as part
of the same patch. However, when a package is being modified, that's a
different story, and the package change should be in a separate patch
than the DEVELOPERS addition.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-04 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-03 21:10 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] docs: update DEVELOPERS modification process Joseph Kogut
2017-11-04 18:53 ` Baruch Siach
2017-11-04 22:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-11-05 6:07 ` Baruch Siach
2017-11-05 8:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-05 7:43 ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-05 8:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-05 20:14 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171104231427.3b3f436a@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox