From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH/next 1/2] package/dovecot: bump version to 2.2.33.2
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:00:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171123220055.3be02c93@windsurf.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171114072203.yznumdrkiad5xtwj@tarshish>
Hello,
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 09:22:03 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > DOVECOT_VERSION_MAJOR = 2.2
> > -DOVECOT_VERSION = $(DOVECOT_VERSION_MAJOR).31
> > +DOVECOT_VERSION = $(DOVECOT_VERSION_MAJOR).33.2
> > DOVECOT_SITE = http://www.dovecot.org/releases/$(DOVECOT_VERSION_MAJOR)
> > DOVECOT_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
> > DOVECOT_LICENSE = LGPL-2.1
>
> Unrelated to this patch, but since COPYING.MIT is one of the license files,
> why isn't the MIT license mentioned here?
Good catch. The COPYING file explains pretty well was going on here. It
says:
"""
Everything in src/lib/, src/auth/, src/lib-sql/ and src/lib-ntlm/ is under
MIT license (see COPYING.MIT) unless otherwise mentioned at the beginning
of the file.
Everything else is LGPLv2.1 (see COPYING.LGPL) unless otherwise mentioned
at the beginning of the file.
Current exceptions are:
src/lib/md5.c : Public Domain
src/lib/sha1.c and sha2.c:
[... here the next of BSD-3c]
src/lib/UnicodeData.txt:
[... something that looks very similar to
https://spdx.org/licenses/Unicode-DFS-2015.html, but isn't exactly the
same ...]
So perhaps:
DOVECOT_LICENSE = LGPL-2.1, MIT, Public Domain, Unicode-DFS-2015
something like that ?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-23 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-14 6:51 [Buildroot] [PATCH/next 1/2] package/dovecot: bump version to 2.2.33.2 Bernd Kuhls
2017-11-14 6:51 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH/next 2/2] package/dovecot-pigeonhole: bump version to 0.4.21 Bernd Kuhls
2017-11-14 7:22 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH/next 1/2] package/dovecot: bump version to 2.2.33.2 Baruch Siach
2017-11-23 21:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-11-24 5:06 ` Baruch Siach
2017-11-23 21:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171123220055.3be02c93@windsurf.lan \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox