* [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2018-01-04
[not found] ` <20180105084309.GB8058@airbook.vandijck-laurijssen.be>
@ 2018-01-05 8:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-05 9:24 ` Kurt Van Dijck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-01-05 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 09:43:09 +0100, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > Results for the 'master' branch
> > ===============================
> >
> > Build failures related to your packages:
> >
> > xtensa | nilfs-utils-v2.2.7 | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a9fe41ed428d26ef5500cec9f762c0bae3eebd39
>
> I just ran this on my local branch, including the patches I sent
> yesterday (and are still pending), and that went ok, so I propose
> to wait and see until those 2 patches are accepted/denied.
>
> Just a question.
> I don't understand why xtensa fails today and not yesterday ...
> Is there a random toolchain selection everyday for each package to save
> buildserver resources?
The autobuilders only do random testing. Essentially, what they do is:
- Pick a random architecture/toolchain configuration among the one
available in support/config-fragments/autobuild/
- Run "make randpackageconfig" to generate on top of the
architecture/toolchain configuration a random selection of packages.
- Build
So the results every day are different, since it's completely random
what testing is being done. This allows us to test a very wide variety
of package/toolchain/architecture combinations, since doing an
exhaustive testing is simply impossible when you have thousands of
Config.in options.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2018-01-04
2018-01-05 8:59 ` [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2018-01-04 Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2018-01-05 9:24 ` Kurt Van Dijck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kurt Van Dijck @ 2018-01-05 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 09:43:09 +0100, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
>
> > > Results for the 'master' branch
> > > ===============================
> > >
> > > Build failures related to your packages:
> > >
> > > xtensa | nilfs-utils-v2.2.7 | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a9fe41ed428d26ef5500cec9f762c0bae3eebd39
> >
> > I just ran this on my local branch, including the patches I sent
> > yesterday (and are still pending), and that went ok, so I propose
> > to wait and see until those 2 patches are accepted/denied.
> >
> > Just a question.
> > I don't understand why xtensa fails today and not yesterday ...
> > Is there a random toolchain selection everyday for each package to save
> > buildserver resources?
>
> The autobuilders only do random testing. Essentially, what they do is:
>
> - Pick a random architecture/toolchain configuration among the one
> available in support/config-fragments/autobuild/
>
> - Run "make randpackageconfig" to generate on top of the
> architecture/toolchain configuration a random selection of packages.
>
> - Build
>
> So the results every day are different, since it's completely random
> what testing is being done. This allows us to test a very wide variety
> of package/toolchain/architecture combinations, since doing an
> exhaustive testing is simply impossible when you have thousands of
> Config.in options.
I see.
I understand the impossibility :-)
Thanks for sharing.
Kurt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-05 9:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20180105070004.41340207B4@mail.free-electrons.com>
[not found] ` <20180105084309.GB8058@airbook.vandijck-laurijssen.be>
2018-01-05 8:59 ` [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2018-01-04 Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-05 9:24 ` Kurt Van Dijck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox