Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Buildroot] host-libsemanage build failure
       [not found] ` <20180118101016.GA11479@gmail.com>
@ 2018-01-18 10:19   ` Thomas Petazzoni
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-01-18 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

Hello,

+Buildroot mailing list in Cc.

On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:10:16 +0100, Marcus Folkesson wrote:

> I'm looking at this build, but I'm unable to reproduce it.
> Has this been a problem for a while or is it new? Is it possible to see
> all build results for a certain package?

Yes:

  http://autobuild.buildroot.net/?reason=<package-version>

so:

  http://autobuild.buildroot.net/?reason=host-libsemanage-2.7

So it is the first time that this happens.

> However, I discovered another problem.
> libsemanage is installing configuration files to $(DESTDIR)/etc/, what
> is the best practice to handle these type of installations? I guess the
> SELinux guys do not want to have it installed to
> $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/etc.
> This must have been a problem for a while, it does not seems to be
> related to my patch (same error even if I revert it).

Autotools typically has a separate sysconfdir option, which is not
subject to prefix:

                --prefix=/usr \
                --exec-prefix=/usr \
                --sysconfdir=/etc \

> Is it a big no-no to use DESTDIR=$(HOST_DIR) in the installation stage?
> I know you told me to omit DESTDIR and instead use PREFIX=$(HOST_DIR)
> during host installation.

What is the problem with using the standard semantic?
DESTDIR=$(HOST_DIR) PREFIX=$(HOST_DIR) is not correct because files
would be installed in $(HOST_DIR)/$(HOST_DIR). Just DESTDIR=$(HOST_DIR)
PREFIX=/usr is not correct, because that means the program/library
expects to be executed from /usr.

> When talking about SELinux.. I saw that we have more packages that is
> part of the SELinux project that I should fix:
> - semodule-utils
> - restorecond
> - checkpolicy
> - policycoreutils

Right. Though perhaps we should wait for upstream's feedback. I'm a bit
unsure of what will be upstream's reaction to those patches, so perhaps
wait for feedback before fixing all the remaining packages ?

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-01-18 10:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20180118070006.DE0B320994@mail.free-electrons.com>
     [not found] ` <20180118101016.GA11479@gmail.com>
2018-01-18 10:19   ` [Buildroot] host-libsemanage build failure Thomas Petazzoni

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox