From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] support/dockerfile: add directives to run as non-root
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 08:18:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180205071820.GA2417@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABa6e=otTJ1GiyhBA_hXXxNcyGts0TH5=CW=abBiwa5TageAHw@mail.gmail.com>
Cam, All,
On 2018-02-05 14:52 +1100, Cam Hutchison spake thusly:
> On 4 February 2018 at 21:04, Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
[--SNIP--]
> >> I don't know much about Docker, but I was of the understanding that each
> >> run statement creates a new layer and the number of layers should be
> >> minimized, which is why you normally see stuff like:
[--SNIP--]
> Minimizing the number of layers for simple layers like the "RUN useradd"
> and "RUN chown" really doesn't save very much.
>
> Where the big win comes in (and is not mentioned in the official
> documentation) is when you keep the "install && build && clean" commands
> in a single RUN command. This matters because if you split it up over
> multiple layers, the earlier layers still contain all the stuff the
> later layers try to clean. The end result is a fat image that contains
> the stuff you wanted to remove in a lower layer, with whiteout entries
> in a higher layer, so it only looks like the files have been removed.
>
> Your patch set does the right thing WRT the debian install/clean, so all
> good, but I thought I'd mention this because it did not come up in any
> discussions here or in the linked docs.
OK, so we *do* have a Docker expert, now! ;-)
Thank you for your explanations, that was very instructive. I gues
that's because aufs is used underneath, or something like that?
I would have expected that, instead of implicit, a layer would have been
explicit, like with a COMMIT keyword or something like that...
Anyway, it all makes sense in hindsight, indeed. Thanks!
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-05 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-06 15:28 [Buildroot] [PATCH] support/dockerfile: add directives to run as non-root Yann E. MORIN
2018-01-12 21:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-13 11:28 ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-01-14 13:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-14 21:32 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-02-03 21:47 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-02-04 10:04 ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-02-04 14:46 ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-02-05 3:52 ` Cam Hutchison
2018-02-05 7:18 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2018-02-05 9:51 ` Cam Hutchison
2018-02-05 10:56 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180205071820.GA2417@scaer \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox