From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] core/instrumentation: shave minutes off the build time
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 00:03:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180324000332.2b6ff7e7@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <491c4cfa-b468-7208-2e38-690cdcec222f@mind.be>
Hello,
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 23:39:47 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> > The current timestamp-based approach not guaranteeing an accurate list is
> > problematic for many such uses. And as you already mentioned, since we don't have
> > full control over the build steps done in any given package, we don't know which
> > timestamps they will use. There may be very good reasons to install certain
> > files with their original timestamp and not the one from the build.
>
> We could revert to the original before/after file list approach, and just use
> something like "stat -c '%N %Y %f'" instead of md5sum.
>
> Though I certainly like Trent's idea of installing each package in a separate
> directory, too. With PPS we're more or less there anyway. We'd just need to step
> up the adoption rate of PPS then :-)
With the PPS patches I posted, we are not installing each package to a
separate folder, but to a folder where all the package dependencies
have already been installed.
Of course, we could change to a model where the per-package staging and
target folders really only contain what the package has installed, and
have a separate per-package SDK, in which we do the "accumulation" of
the dependencies.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-23 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-15 20:35 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/2] core/instrumentation: optimisations Yann E. MORIN
2018-03-15 20:35 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] core/intrumetnation: don't spawn to get seconds-since-EPOCH Yann E. MORIN
2018-03-17 11:54 ` Cam Hutchison
2018-03-18 16:16 ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-03-19 16:15 ` Trent Piepho
2018-03-15 20:35 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] core/instrumentation: shave minutes off the build time Yann E. MORIN
2018-03-18 14:14 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-03-18 16:15 ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-03-18 16:33 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-03-22 16:41 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-03-22 16:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-22 17:11 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-03-22 17:25 ` Trent Piepho
2018-03-22 22:39 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-03-23 22:39 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-03-23 23:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-03-19 16:30 ` Trent Piepho
2018-03-19 16:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-19 20:04 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-03-20 21:47 ` Trent Piepho
2018-03-19 16:53 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180324000332.2b6ff7e7@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox