* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] wampcc: needs atomic
@ 2018-07-07 16:08 Fabrice Fontaine
2018-07-10 9:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fabrice Fontaine @ 2018-07-07 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Fixes:
- http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/2f994762d4e01a904c50cf2728a4103e6e79da2a
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
---
package/wampcc/wampcc.mk | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/package/wampcc/wampcc.mk b/package/wampcc/wampcc.mk
index d8e093f679..dcd65f49d5 100644
--- a/package/wampcc/wampcc.mk
+++ b/package/wampcc/wampcc.mk
@@ -11,4 +11,9 @@ WAMPCC_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
WAMPCC_LICENSE = MIT
WAMPCC_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE
+# Uses __atomic_fetch_add_8
+ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_LIBATOMIC),y)
+WAMPCC_CONF_OPTS += -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="$(TARGET_CXXFLAGS) -latomic"
+endif
+
$(eval $(cmake-package))
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] wampcc: needs atomic
2018-07-07 16:08 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] wampcc: needs atomic Fabrice Fontaine
@ 2018-07-10 9:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-07-10 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello Fabrice,
On Sat, 7 Jul 2018 18:08:55 +0200, Fabrice Fontaine wrote:
> Fixes:
> - http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/2f994762d4e01a904c50cf2728a4103e6e79da2a
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
> ---
> package/wampcc/wampcc.mk | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/package/wampcc/wampcc.mk b/package/wampcc/wampcc.mk
> index d8e093f679..dcd65f49d5 100644
> --- a/package/wampcc/wampcc.mk
> +++ b/package/wampcc/wampcc.mk
> @@ -11,4 +11,9 @@ WAMPCC_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
> WAMPCC_LICENSE = MIT
> WAMPCC_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE
>
> +# Uses __atomic_fetch_add_8
> +ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_LIBATOMIC),y)
> +WAMPCC_CONF_OPTS += -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="$(TARGET_CXXFLAGS) -latomic"
> +endif
As usual, it would be nicer to handle this directly within the
CMakeLists.txt, but OK.
However, there's one thing we have not handled completely correctly for
all those libatomic issues. Linking with libatomic when
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_LIBATOMIC is OK, but you're not guaranteed that
libatomic exists. Indeed, libatomic only exists since gcc 4.8.
So a package that use atomic built-ins should both:
(1) depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC
(2) link with libatomic if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_LIBATOMIC
Your commit does (2) correctly, but forgets to do (1). For example, if
you try to build wampcc for Sparc with a gcc 4.7 toolchain, it will
still fail with your commit because libatomic didn't exist back in the
gcc 4.7 days.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-07-10 9:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-07-07 16:08 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] wampcc: needs atomic Fabrice Fontaine
2018-07-10 9:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox