[Buildroot] [PATCH] package/cutelyst: Update micro version for build fix

[Buildroot] [PATCH] package/cutelyst: Update micro version for build fix

[Daniel Nicoletti]

Signed-off-by: Daniel Nicoletti <dantti12@gmail.com>
---
 package/cutelyst/cutelyst.hash | 2 +-
 package/cutelyst/cutelyst.mk   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/package/cutelyst/cutelyst.hash b/package/cutelyst/cutelyst.hash
index 58645e50c2..edc83f3886 100644
--- a/package/cutelyst/cutelyst.hash
+++ b/package/cutelyst/cutelyst.hash
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 # Locally calculated after checking pgp signature
-sha256  a5d40c5e0027982181529449ffa807492f5759c2c604cdc467e748445721ff28    cutelyst-2.5.1.tar.gz
+sha256  d088e6dbbb9a1ef03b4481d44746a2b086724842f5ee85abe8095e2eb6fe0da4    cutelyst-2.5.2.tar.gz
 sha256  dc626520dcd53a22f727af3ee42c770e56c97a64fe3adb063799d8ab032fe551    COPYING
diff --git a/package/cutelyst/cutelyst.mk b/package/cutelyst/cutelyst.mk
index 498d2d5545..e8695a7b3a 100644
--- a/package/cutelyst/cutelyst.mk
+++ b/package/cutelyst/cutelyst.mk
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 #
 ################################################################################
 
-CUTELYST_VERSION = 2.5.1
+CUTELYST_VERSION = 2.5.2
 CUTELYST_SITE = https://github.com/cutelyst/cutelyst/archive/v$(CUTELYST_VERSION)
 CUTELYST_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
 CUTELYST_SUPPORTS_IN_SOURCE_BUILD = NO
-- 
2.17.0

[Buildroot] [PATCH] package/cutelyst: Update micro version for build fix

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

Thanks for this update!

On Thu,  2 Aug 2018 10:38:13 -0300, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Nicoletti <dantti12@gmail.com>

If this is fixing a build issue reported by the autobuilders, please
include in your commit log something like this:

"""
Fixes:

  http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/13442b0f6be7faaa2a188b9ae4fe3336e2614687/
"""

(Of course, use the correct hash, I just took a random build results to
illustrate here.)

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH] package/cutelyst: Update micro version for build fix

[Daniel Nicoletti]

Em qui, 2 de ago de 2018 ?s 10:47, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> escreveu:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for this update!
>
> On Thu,  2 Aug 2018 10:38:13 -0300, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Nicoletti <dantti12@gmail.com>
>
> If this is fixing a build issue reported by the autobuilders, please
> include in your commit log something like this:
>
> """
> Fixes:
>
>   http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/13442b0f6be7faaa2a188b9ae4fe3336e2614687/
> """
>
> (Of course, use the correct hash, I just took a random build results to
> illustrate here.)
Should all build failures be included or just one with the problem?
This fixes the same issue in both:
         arm |                 cutelyst-2.5.1 |
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/90c56e4e001daa71efd92c926fe3a5dc5ec759e7
         arc |                 cutelyst-2.5.1 |
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/01933cfc6ef8eea890e3b6c870c7d6cada7db5ee

This here has a new error:
        i686 |                 cutelyst-2.5.1 |
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d38411eda9edf16e2c40d8931bcfc889faae43dc
I use SO_REUSEPORT but it seems this kernel is old and does not have
support for it

>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com



-- 
Daniel Nicoletti

KDE Developer - http://dantti.wordpress.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH] package/cutelyst: Update micro version for build fix

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello Daniel,

On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 12:31:57 -0300, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:

> > (Of course, use the correct hash, I just took a random build results to
> > illustrate here.)  
> Should all build failures be included or just one with the problem?

Just one with the problem.

> This here has a new error:
>         i686 |                 cutelyst-2.5.1 |
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d38411eda9edf16e2c40d8931bcfc889faae43dc
> I use SO_REUSEPORT but it seems this kernel is old and does not have
> support for it

Then you need to add a dependency on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_3
where 3_3 matches the kernel version in which SO_REUSEPORT was added.

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com