[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 0/2] sunxi-mali-mainline*: add arm64 build support and

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 0/2] sunxi-mali-mainline*: add arm64 build support and

[Giulio Benetti]

Blobs for arm64(aarch64) and r8p1 version are available at Bootlin Github.
r8p1 driver support has been added at mripard Github.

Add support on both sunxi-mali-mainline and sunxi-mali-mainline-driver
packages to:
- Build on arm64(aarch64).
- use r8p1 blob version.

Changes V1->V2:
- make sunxi-mali-mainline changes in one patch to be bi-sectable.
- make sunxi-mali-mainline-driver changes in one patch to be bi-sectable.

Giulio Benetti (2):
  sunxi-mali-mainline: add support for arm64(aarch64) architecture and
    r8p1 blob version.
  sunxi-mali-mainline-driver: bump version and add support for building
    on arm64(aarch64).

 .../sunxi-mali-mainline-driver.mk                 |  8 +++++++-
 package/sunxi-mali-mainline/Config.in             |  6 ++++--
 .../sunxi-mali-mainline/sunxi-mali-mainline.mk    | 15 ++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/2] sunxi-mali-mainline: add support for arm64(aarch64) architecture and r8p1 blob version.

[Giulio Benetti]

Blobs for arm64(aarch64) and r8p1 version are now available at Bootlin
Github.

So:
- Bump version to latest commit:
For arm64 architecture and r8p1 version.

git shortlog --no-merges cb3e8ece9b2c3a70cbeb3204cd6f30eceaa32023..
Giulio Benetti (1):
      Reorder folders splitting includes and libraries.

Maxime Ripard (6):
      Move binaries to an arch subfolder
      Make x11 binaries path consistent
      Add r6p2 arm wayland blobs
      Add r6p2 arm64 blobs
      Add r8p1 fbdev blobs
      Add r8p1 arm64 fbdev blobs

- Add support for them also under arm64(aarch64) architecture copying the
right blobs according to architecture(arm or arm64) checking if BR2_arm
or BR2_aarch64 is enabled.
Only BR2_arm needs to provide BR2_ARM_EABIHF, so check must be done only
in that case.
- Mali-blobs repository folder layout has been reordered, so modify path
when copying headers and libraries.
- When copying libraries copy only *.so* files to avoid useless files to
end into target folder.

Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com>
---
 package/sunxi-mali-mainline/Config.in             |  6 ++++--
 .../sunxi-mali-mainline/sunxi-mali-mainline.mk    | 15 ++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/package/sunxi-mali-mainline/Config.in b/package/sunxi-mali-mainline/Config.in
index 759bed86ba..a889864465 100644
--- a/package/sunxi-mali-mainline/Config.in
+++ b/package/sunxi-mali-mainline/Config.in
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 config BR2_PACKAGE_SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE
 	bool "sunxi-mali-mainline"
-	depends on BR2_arm
-	depends on BR2_ARM_EABIHF
+	depends on BR2_aarch64 || (BR2_ARM_EABIHF && BR2_arm)
 	depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC
 	select BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_LIBEGL
 	select BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_LIBGLES
@@ -26,12 +25,15 @@ choice
 
 config BR2_PACKAGE_SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_R6P2
 	bool "r6p2"
+config BR2_PACKAGE_SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_R8P1
+	bool "r8p1"
 
 endchoice
 
 config BR2_PACKAGE_SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_REVISION
 	string
 	default "r6p2"	if BR2_PACKAGE_SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_R6P2
+	default "r8p1"	if BR2_PACKAGE_SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_R8P1
 
 endif
 
diff --git a/package/sunxi-mali-mainline/sunxi-mali-mainline.mk b/package/sunxi-mali-mainline/sunxi-mali-mainline.mk
index 933e2beb0d..05b90f0bee 100644
--- a/package/sunxi-mali-mainline/sunxi-mali-mainline.mk
+++ b/package/sunxi-mali-mainline/sunxi-mali-mainline.mk
@@ -4,20 +4,25 @@
 #
 ################################################################################
 
-SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_VERSION = cb3e8ece9b2c3a70cbeb3204cd6f30eceaa32023
+SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_VERSION = d691cb93884ca8ac67860502117bbec283dc19aa
 SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_SITE = $(call github,free-electrons,mali-blobs,$(SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_VERSION))
 SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
 SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_PROVIDES = libegl libgles
 
 SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_REV = $(call qstrip,$(BR2_PACKAGE_SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_REVISION))
 
+ifeq ($(BR2_arm),y)
+SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_ARCH=arm
+else ifeq ($(BR2_aarch64),y)
+SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_ARCH=arm64
+endif
+
 define SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_INSTALL_STAGING_CMDS
 	mkdir -p $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include
 
-	cp -rf $(@D)/$(SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_REV)/fbdev/lib/lib_fb_dev/* \
+	cp -rf $(@D)/$(SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_REV)/$(SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_ARCH)/fbdev/*.so* \
 		$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/
-	cp -rf $(@D)/$(SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_REV)/fbdev/include/* \
-		$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/
+	cp -rf $(@D)/include/fbdev/* $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/
 
 	$(INSTALL) -D -m 0644 package/sunxi-mali-mainline/egl.pc \
 		$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/pkgconfig/egl.pc
@@ -27,7 +32,7 @@ endef
 
 define SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS
 	mkdir -p $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib
-	cp -rf $(@D)/$(SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_REV)/fbdev/lib/lib_fb_dev/* \
+	cp -rf $(@D)/$(SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_REV)/$(SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_ARCH)/fbdev/*.so* \
 		$(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib/
 endef
 
-- 
2.17.1

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] sunxi-mali-mainline-driver: bump version and add support for building on arm64(aarch64).

[Giulio Benetti]

Blobs for arm64(aarch64) are available at Bootlin Github and
sunxi-mali-mainline package has been updated to support them.

Add support for building on arm64(aarch64):
- Bump version to latest commit:
For support H3 and H5 SoCs and r8p1 driver version.

git shortlog --invert-grep --grep travis --no-merges 52ef1c5e133cc5fd791ca636239dc5e7b19c26d5..
Maxime Ripard (6):
      Add r8p1 release
      sunxi: Move the reset test to a function
      sunxi: Add H3 support
      sunxi: Add H5 support
      sunxi: Remove generic compatible
      sunxi: Set clock rate in the driver

- Add ARCH=arm or ARCH=arm64 to SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS
to build for the right architecture according to BR2_arm or BR2_aarch64.

Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com>
---
 .../sunxi-mali-mainline-driver.mk                         | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/package/sunxi-mali-mainline-driver/sunxi-mali-mainline-driver.mk b/package/sunxi-mali-mainline-driver/sunxi-mali-mainline-driver.mk
index 24817b07c7..e7a5ed2079 100644
--- a/package/sunxi-mali-mainline-driver/sunxi-mali-mainline-driver.mk
+++ b/package/sunxi-mali-mainline-driver/sunxi-mali-mainline-driver.mk
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 #
 ################################################################################
 
-SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_VERSION = 52ef1c5e133cc5fd791ca636239dc5e7b19c26d5
+SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_VERSION = 8e6b7d25b13089d53dbfc1ebd9e8737b0dc809cb
 SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_SITE = $(call github,mripard,sunxi-mali,$(SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_VERSION))
 SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_DEPENDENCIES = linux
 
@@ -13,6 +13,12 @@ SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS = \
 	CROSS_COMPILE=$(TARGET_CROSS) \
 	INSTALL_MOD_PATH=$(TARGET_DIR)
 
+ifeq ($(BR2_arm),y)
+SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS += ARCH=arm
+else ifeq ($(BR2_aarch64),y)
+SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS += ARCH=arm64
+endif
+
 define SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_USE_APPLY_PATCHES
 	ln -sf $(SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_REV)/series $(@D)/patches
 	$(SED) 's|quilt push -a|$(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/apply-patches.sh . ../patches|' \
-- 
2.17.1

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/2] sunxi-mali-mainline: add support for arm64(aarch64) architecture and r8p1 blob version.

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 02:06:47 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Blobs for arm64(aarch64) and r8p1 version are now available at Bootlin
> Github.
> 
> So:
> - Bump version to latest commit:
> For arm64 architecture and r8p1 version.
> 
> git shortlog --no-merges cb3e8ece9b2c3a70cbeb3204cd6f30eceaa32023..
> Giulio Benetti (1):
>       Reorder folders splitting includes and libraries.
> 
> Maxime Ripard (6):
>       Move binaries to an arch subfolder
>       Make x11 binaries path consistent
>       Add r6p2 arm wayland blobs
>       Add r6p2 arm64 blobs
>       Add r8p1 fbdev blobs
>       Add r8p1 arm64 fbdev blobs
> 
> - Add support for them also under arm64(aarch64) architecture copying the
> right blobs according to architecture(arm or arm64) checking if BR2_arm
> or BR2_aarch64 is enabled.
> Only BR2_arm needs to provide BR2_ARM_EABIHF, so check must be done only
> in that case.
> - Mali-blobs repository folder layout has been reordered, so modify path
> when copying headers and libraries.
> - When copying libraries copy only *.so* files to avoid useless files to
> end into target folder.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com>
> ---
>  package/sunxi-mali-mainline/Config.in             |  6 ++++--
>  .../sunxi-mali-mainline/sunxi-mali-mainline.mk    | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

This could have been three patches: one bumping the version, one adding
support for the r8p1 version, and one adding support for aarch64. But
OK, I've applied as is, as the patch wasn't too large. But for your
next contributions, please make sure to split them in logical changes.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] sunxi-mali-mainline-driver: bump version and add support for building on arm64(aarch64).

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello Giulio,

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 02:06:48 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Blobs for arm64(aarch64) are available at Bootlin Github and
> sunxi-mali-mainline package has been updated to support them.
> 
> Add support for building on arm64(aarch64):
> - Bump version to latest commit:
> For support H3 and H5 SoCs and r8p1 driver version.
> 
> git shortlog --invert-grep --grep travis --no-merges 52ef1c5e133cc5fd791ca636239dc5e7b19c26d5..
> Maxime Ripard (6):
>       Add r8p1 release
>       sunxi: Move the reset test to a function
>       sunxi: Add H3 support
>       sunxi: Add H5 support
>       sunxi: Remove generic compatible
>       sunxi: Set clock rate in the driver
> 
> - Add ARCH=arm or ARCH=arm64 to SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS
> to build for the right architecture according to BR2_arm or BR2_aarch64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com>

So actually your PATCH 1/2 without PATCH 2/2 is broken, because PATCH
1/2 now allows to enable sunxi-mali-mainline on AArch64, but
sunxi-mali-mainline-driver does not support AArch64. It seems like you
have some issue understanding the concept of bisectability :-)

Anyway, now that PATCH 1/2 is applied and pushed, it's too late to back
out.

> @@ -13,6 +13,12 @@ SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS = \
>  	CROSS_COMPILE=$(TARGET_CROSS) \
>  	INSTALL_MOD_PATH=$(TARGET_DIR)
>  
> +ifeq ($(BR2_arm),y)
> +SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS += ARCH=arm
> +else ifeq ($(BR2_aarch64),y)
> +SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS += ARCH=arm64
> +endif

Could you instead change the .mk to do this:

SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS = \
	$(LINUX_MAKE_FLAGS) \
        KDIR=$(LINUX_DIR)

Indeed, LINUX_MAKE_FLAGS already include CROSS_COMPILE,
INSTALL_MOD_PATH and ARCH.

As separate commits, please add hash files for both sunxi-mali-mainline
and sunxi-mainline-driver. Also, it would be good to have patches
adding license information for both of those packages. For the
mali-blobs, there's a PDF containing the EULA. For the kernel driver, I
didn't see a license file, but I didn't look everywhere. If there is
none, could you check with Maxime to make sure a license file gets
added ?

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] sunxi-mali-mainline-driver: bump version and add support for building on arm64(aarch64).

[Giulio Benetti]

Hello,

Il 22/08/2018 13:29, Thomas Petazzoni ha scritto:
> Hello Giulio,
> 
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 02:06:48 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>> Blobs for arm64(aarch64) are available at Bootlin Github and
>> sunxi-mali-mainline package has been updated to support them.
>>
>> Add support for building on arm64(aarch64):
>> - Bump version to latest commit:
>> For support H3 and H5 SoCs and r8p1 driver version.
>>
>> git shortlog --invert-grep --grep travis --no-merges 52ef1c5e133cc5fd791ca636239dc5e7b19c26d5..
>> Maxime Ripard (6):
>>        Add r8p1 release
>>        sunxi: Move the reset test to a function
>>        sunxi: Add H3 support
>>        sunxi: Add H5 support
>>        sunxi: Remove generic compatible
>>        sunxi: Set clock rate in the driver
>>
>> - Add ARCH=arm or ARCH=arm64 to SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS
>> to build for the right architecture according to BR2_arm or BR2_aarch64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com>
> 
> So actually your PATCH 1/2 without PATCH 2/2 is broken, because PATCH
> 1/2 now allows to enable sunxi-mali-mainline on AArch64, but
> sunxi-mali-mainline-driver does not support AArch64. It seems like you
> have some issue understanding the concept of bisectability :-)

Yes, fortunately you've helped me out to understand it well now.
Thanks

> 
> Anyway, now that PATCH 1/2 is applied and pushed, it's too late to back
> out.
> 
>> @@ -13,6 +13,12 @@ SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS = \
>>   	CROSS_COMPILE=$(TARGET_CROSS) \
>>   	INSTALL_MOD_PATH=$(TARGET_DIR)
>>   
>> +ifeq ($(BR2_arm),y)
>> +SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS += ARCH=arm
>> +else ifeq ($(BR2_aarch64),y)
>> +SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS += ARCH=arm64
>> +endif
> 
> Could you instead change the .mk to do this:
> 
> SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_DRIVER_MAKE_OPTS = \
> 	$(LINUX_MAKE_FLAGS) \
>          KDIR=$(LINUX_DIR)
> 
> Indeed, LINUX_MAKE_FLAGS already include CROSS_COMPILE,
> INSTALL_MOD_PATH and ARCH.

Sure, this is very clean.

> 
> As separate commits, please add hash files for both sunxi-mali-mainline
> and sunxi-mainline-driver. 

Ok.

Also, it would be good to have patches
> adding license information for both of those packages. For the
> mali-blobs, there's a PDF containing the EULA. 

Do you mean like odroid-mali package .mk?
I mean reporting:
SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_LICENSE = EULA
SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_LICENSE_FILES = EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf
Right?

For the kernel driver, I
> didn't see a license file, but I didn't look everywhere. If there is
> none, could you check with Maxime to make sure a license file gets
> added ?

I'm not an expert of licensing but as stated here:
https://developer.arm.com/products/software/mali-drivers/utgard-kernel
it is distributed under GPLv2 licence the base code,
so the added code should be too.
What do you all think?

Kind regards
Giulio Benetti

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] sunxi-mali-mainline-driver: bump version and add support for building on arm64(aarch64).

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 20:37:13 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:

> Also, it would be good to have patches
> > adding license information for both of those packages. For the
> > mali-blobs, there's a PDF containing the EULA.   
> 
> Do you mean like odroid-mali package .mk?
> I mean reporting:
> SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_LICENSE = EULA
> SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_LICENSE_FILES = EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf
> Right?

Yes. Make sure "make legal-info" is working after this.

> For the kernel driver, I
> > didn't see a license file, but I didn't look everywhere. If there is
> > none, could you check with Maxime to make sure a license file gets
> > added ?  
> 
> I'm not an expert of licensing but as stated here:
> https://developer.arm.com/products/software/mali-drivers/utgard-kernel
> it is distributed under GPLv2 licence the base code,
> so the added code should be too.
> What do you all think?

Yes, of course, it should be under GPLv2, but it would be nice to have
a license file in the source code.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] sunxi-mali-mainline-driver: bump version and add support for building on arm64(aarch64).

[Giulio Benetti]

Hello,

Il 22/08/2018 21:26, Thomas Petazzoni ha scritto:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 20:37:13 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> 
>> Also, it would be good to have patches
>>> adding license information for both of those packages. For the
>>> mali-blobs, there's a PDF containing the EULA.
>>
>> Do you mean like odroid-mali package .mk?
>> I mean reporting:
>> SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_LICENSE = EULA
>> SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_LICENSE_FILES = EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf
>> Right?
> 
> Yes. Make sure "make legal-info" is working after this.

I'm getting problems with whitespaces in pdf filename.
I couldn't find in Buildroot Documentation if it's allowed or not having 
filenames containing spaces.
I've tried using:
'EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf'
"EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf"
etc.
but with no luck.

If it's not possible to have whitespaces, should I workaround it in 
package changing filename before legal-info recipe?
Like:
EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf
becoming:
EULA_for_Mali_400MP_AW.pdf
?

Thanks
Giulio

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] sunxi-mali-mainline-driver: bump version and add support for building on arm64(aarch64).

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 21:10:56 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:

> I'm getting problems with whitespaces in pdf filename.
> I couldn't find in Buildroot Documentation if it's allowed or not having 
> filenames containing spaces.
> I've tried using:
> 'EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf'
> "EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf"
> etc.
> but with no luck.
> 
> If it's not possible to have whitespaces, should I workaround it in 
> package changing filename before legal-info recipe?
> Like:
> EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf
> becoming:
> EULA_for_Mali_400MP_AW.pdf
> ?

Yes, I think it makes sense to have a POST_PATCH_HOOKS that renames the
file so that it doesn't have spaces.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] sunxi-mali-mainline-driver: bump version and add support for building on arm64(aarch64).

[Yann E. MORIN]

Giulio, All,

On 2018-08-24 21:10 +0200, Giulio Benetti spake thusly:
[--SNIP--]
> I'm getting problems with whitespaces in pdf filename.
> I couldn't find in Buildroot Documentation if it's allowed or not having
> filenames containing spaces.
> I've tried using:
> 'EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf'
> "EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf"
> etc.
> but with no luck.

Could you please also try with a \-escape:

    SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_LICENSE_FILES = EULA\ for\ Mali\ 400MP\ _AW.pdf

If that still fails, please try with two \\.

I would prefer if we were to be able to keep the original filenames in
license files, in case something else in the package would reference
them.

> If it's not possible to have whitespaces, should I workaround it in package
> changing filename before legal-info recipe?
> Like:
> EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf
> becoming:
> EULA_for_Mali_400MP_AW.pdf
> ?

As Thomas already replied, yes. But I'd prefer if that were used as a
last resort.

Thanks!

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] sunxi-mali-mainline-driver: bump version and add support for building on arm64(aarch64).

[Giulio Benetti]

Hi,

Il 24/08/2018 23:14, Yann E. MORIN ha scritto:
> Giulio, All,
> 
> On 2018-08-24 21:10 +0200, Giulio Benetti spake thusly:
> [--SNIP--]
>> I'm getting problems with whitespaces in pdf filename.
>> I couldn't find in Buildroot Documentation if it's allowed or not having
>> filenames containing spaces.
>> I've tried using:
>> 'EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf'
>> "EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf"
>> etc.
>> but with no luck.
> 
> Could you please also try with a \-escape:
> 
>      SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_LICENSE_FILES = EULA\ for\ Mali\ 400MP\ _AW.pdf
> 
> If that still fails, please try with two \\.
> 
> I would prefer if we were to be able to keep the original filenames in
> license files, in case something else in the package would reference
> them.
> 
>> If it's not possible to have whitespaces, should I workaround it in package
>> changing filename before legal-info recipe?
>> Like:
>> EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf
>> becoming:
>> EULA_for_Mali_400MP_AW.pdf
>> ?
> 
> As Thomas already replied, yes. But I'd prefer if that were used as a
> last resort.

Just tried with both \ and \\ but nothing to do, it doesn't work.
It always tries to find 'EULA' or 'EULA\'

So do I proceed with renaming on POST_PATCH_HOOKS?

Thanks
Giulio

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] sunxi-mali-mainline-driver: bump version and add support for building on arm64(aarch64).

[Yann E. MORIN]

Giulio, All,

On 2018-08-24 23:28 +0200, Giulio Benetti spake thusly:
> Il 24/08/2018 23:14, Yann E. MORIN ha scritto:
> >On 2018-08-24 21:10 +0200, Giulio Benetti spake thusly:
> >[--SNIP--]
> >>I'm getting problems with whitespaces in pdf filename.
> >>I couldn't find in Buildroot Documentation if it's allowed or not having
> >>filenames containing spaces.
> >>I've tried using:
> >>'EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf'
> >>"EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf"
> >>etc.
> >>but with no luck.
> >Could you please also try with a \-escape:
> >     SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_LICENSE_FILES = EULA\ for\ Mali\ 400MP\ _AW.pdf
[--SNIP--]
> Just tried with both \ and \\ but nothing to do, it doesn't work.
> It always tries to find 'EULA' or 'EULA\'

Damn... Yeah, I now had a look at the code, and it indeed can not work.
I had hoped ot was a shell command that would do the splitting, but no;
it is done by a make foreach loop, so we're doomed...

> So do I proceed with renaming on POST_PATCH_HOOKS?

Yes, please.

Thanks! :-)

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] sunxi-mali-mainline-driver: bump version and add support for building on arm64(aarch64).

[Giulio Benetti]

Hello Maxime,

Il 22/08/2018 21:26, Thomas Petazzoni ha scritto:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 20:37:13 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> 
>> Also, it would be good to have patches
>>> adding license information for both of those packages. For the
>>> mali-blobs, there's a PDF containing the EULA.
>>
>> Do you mean like odroid-mali package .mk?
>> I mean reporting:
>> SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_LICENSE = EULA
>> SUNXI_MALI_MAINLINE_LICENSE_FILES = EULA for Mali 400MP _AW.pdf
>> Right?
> 
> Yes. Make sure "make legal-info" is working after this.
> 
>> For the kernel driver, I
>>> didn't see a license file, but I didn't look everywhere. If there is
>>> none, could you check with Maxime to make sure a license file gets
>>> added ?
>>
>> I'm not an expert of licensing but as stated here:
>> https://developer.arm.com/products/software/mali-drivers/utgard-kernel
>> it is distributed under GPLv2 licence the base code,
>> so the added code should be too.
>> What do you all think?
> 
> Yes, of course, it should be under GPLv2, but it would be nice to have
> a license file in the source code.

Is there a way to add a license into sunxi-mali repository?
Is it enough using a classic GPLv2 COPYING file taken from elsewhere and 
put it in sunxi-mali root folder?
If yes I can contribute to your repo and open a PR.

Thanks

Giulio Benetti