[Buildroot] [PATCH v4 07/17] package/aubio: use the new fftw-double and fftw-single packages

[Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>]

Gwenhael, All,

On 2019-01-21 14:51 +0100, Gwenhael Goavec-Merou spake thusly:
> From: Gwenhael Goavec-Merou <gwenhael.goavec-merou@trabucayre.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gwenhael Goavec-Merou <gwenhael.goavec-merou@trabucayre.com>
> [Thomas: drop the condition on BR2_PACKAGE_FFTW]
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
> ---
> Changes v3 -> v4:
>  * allows to build samplerate without fft support and ensure samplerate and
>    double precision are not enabled in same time. (yann)
> ---
>  package/aubio/aubio.mk | 13 ++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/package/aubio/aubio.mk b/package/aubio/aubio.mk
> index b0cc8b899e..ba182d9bd7 100644
> --- a/package/aubio/aubio.mk
> +++ b/package/aubio/aubio.mk
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ AUBIO_CONF_OPTS += --disable-sndfile
>  endif
>  
>  # Could not compile aubio in double precision mode with libsamplerate
> -ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_LIBSAMPLERATE)$(BR2_PACKAGE_FFTW_PRECISION_SINGLE),yy)
> +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_LIBSAMPLERATE):$(BR2_PACKAGE_FFTW_DOUBLE),y:)
>  AUBIO_DEPENDENCIES += libsamplerate
>  AUBIO_CONF_OPTS += --enable-samplerate
>  else
> @@ -41,15 +41,14 @@ else
>  AUBIO_CONF_OPTS += --disable-jack
>  endif
>  
> -ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_FFTW),y)
> -AUBIO_DEPENDENCIES += fftw
>  # fftw3 require double otherwise it will look for fftw3f
> -ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_FFTW_PRECISION_DOUBLE),y)
> +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_FFTW_DOUBLE),y)
>  AUBIO_CONF_OPTS += --enable-fftw3 --enable-double
> -else ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_FFTW_PRECISION_SINGLE),y)
> +AUBIO_DEPENDENCIES += fftw-double
> +else ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_FFTW_SINGLE),y)
>  AUBIO_CONF_OPTS += --enable-fftw3f --disable-double
> -endif
> -else  # !BR2_PACKAGE_FFTW
> +AUBIO_DEPENDENCIES += fftw-single
> +else
>  AUBIO_CONF_OPTS += --disable-fftw3
>  endif

So, with this new code, it means that using fftw-double takes
precendence over libsamplerate, so we can get in a situation, when
fftw-single, fftw-double, and libsamplerate are all three enabled.

I wonder if, in that situation, we should not favour using libsamplerate and
fftw-single, rather than using just fftw-double?

Note that I am totally OK with the patch as is, and that someone can
come later to change the conditions, so:

Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'