* [Buildroot] Error building Python with musl in 2020.02
@ 2020-03-20 15:12 Simon Rowe
2020-03-20 21:39 ` Peter Seiderer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Simon Rowe @ 2020-03-20 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
I'm getting the following error when trying out 2020.02 with the latest musl-based toolchain
/build/host/bin/x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl-gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os -std=c99 -Wextra -Wno-unused-result -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -I./Include/internal -I. -I./Include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fPIC -DPy_BUILD_CORE_BUILTIN -c ./Modules/xxsubtype.c -o Modules/xxsubtype.o
./Modules/posixmodule.c: In function 'os_copy_file_range_impl':
./Modules/posixmodule.c:9704:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_file_range'; did you mean 'sync_file_range'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
9704 | ret = copy_file_range(src, p_offset_src, dst, p_offset_dst, count, flags);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| sync_file_range
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Makefile:1938: recipe for target 'Modules/posixmodule.o' failed
Has anyone else seen this?
Simon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20200320/29f1874a/attachment.html>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Buildroot] Error building Python with musl in 2020.02 2020-03-20 15:12 [Buildroot] Error building Python with musl in 2020.02 Simon Rowe @ 2020-03-20 21:39 ` Peter Seiderer 2020-03-23 9:33 ` Simon Rowe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Peter Seiderer @ 2020-03-20 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello Simon, On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:12:07 +0000, Simon Rowe <Simon.Rowe@citrix.com> wrote: > I'm getting the following error when trying out 2020.02 with the latest musl-based toolchain > > > /build/host/bin/x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl-gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os -std=c99 -Wextra -Wno-unused-result -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -I./Include/internal -I. -I./Include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fPIC -DPy_BUILD_CORE_BUILTIN -c ./Modules/xxsubtype.c -o Modules/xxsubtype.o > ./Modules/posixmodule.c: In function 'os_copy_file_range_impl': > ./Modules/posixmodule.c:9704:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_file_range'; did you mean 'sync_file_range'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 9704 | ret = copy_file_range(src, p_offset_src, dst, p_offset_dst, count, flags); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | sync_file_range > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > Makefile:1938: recipe for target 'Modules/posixmodule.o' failed > > > Has anyone else seen this? Python or python3? Could you provide a .config or defconfig file for the failure? Regards, Peter > > > Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Error building Python with musl in 2020.02 2020-03-20 21:39 ` Peter Seiderer @ 2020-03-23 9:33 ` Simon Rowe 2020-03-23 17:42 ` Peter Seiderer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Simon Rowe @ 2020-03-23 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot [Apologies for the top posting, stuck with web-based email] python3, defconfig attached. This config has been working with 2019.02, I loaded and re-saved it Simon ________________________________________ From: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net> Sent: 20 March 2020 21:39 To: Simon Rowe Cc: buildroot at busybox.net Subject: Re: [Buildroot] Error building Python with musl in 2020.02 Hello Simon, On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:12:07 +0000, Simon Rowe <Simon.Rowe@citrix.com> wrote: > I'm getting the following error when trying out 2020.02 with the latest musl-based toolchain > > > /build/host/bin/x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl-gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os -std=c99 -Wextra -Wno-unused-result -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -I./Include/internal -I. -I./Include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fPIC -DPy_BUILD_CORE_BUILTIN -c ./Modules/xxsubtype.c -o Modules/xxsubtype.o > ./Modules/posixmodule.c: In function 'os_copy_file_range_impl': > ./Modules/posixmodule.c:9704:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_file_range'; did you mean 'sync_file_range'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 9704 | ret = copy_file_range(src, p_offset_src, dst, p_offset_dst, count, flags); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | sync_file_range > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > Makefile:1938: recipe for target 'Modules/posixmodule.o' failed > > > Has anyone else seen this? Python or python3? Could you provide a .config or defconfig file for the failure? Regards, Peter > > > Simon -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: defconfig Type: application/octet-stream Size: 122583 bytes Desc: defconfig URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20200323/149ed867/attachment-0001.obj> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Error building Python with musl in 2020.02 2020-03-23 9:33 ` Simon Rowe @ 2020-03-23 17:42 ` Peter Seiderer [not found] ` <1585215897497.45733@citrix.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Peter Seiderer @ 2020-03-23 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello Simon, On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:33:21 +0000, Simon Rowe <Simon.Rowe@citrix.com> wrote: > [Apologies for the top posting, stuck with web-based email] > > python3, defconfig attached. This config has been working with 2019.02, I loaded and re-saved it Given defconfig still compiles fine here.... - ./build/python3-3.8.2/Modules/posixmodule.c: The usage of copy_file_range() is protected by HAVE_COPY_FILE_RANGE - HAVE_COPY_FILE_RANGE is defined in pyconfig.h: $ grep HAVE_COPY_FILE_RANGE build/python3-3.8.2/pyconfig.h #define HAVE_COPY_FILE_RANGE 1 - the buildroot compiled musl libc proviedes copy_file_range: $ nm -A host/x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl/sysroot/lib/libc.so | grep copy_file_range host/x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl/sysroot/lib/libc.so:000000000001f4bd T copy_file_range - the header file provides copy_file_range() (protected by _GNU_SOURCE) $ grep copy_file_range host/x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl/sysroot/usr/include/unistd.h ssize_t copy_file_range(int, off_t *, int, off_t *, size_t, unsigned); Please try a plain defconfig (without EXTERNALs), make sure no additional patches/config files are used.....otherwise out of ideas... Regards, Peter > > Simon > > ________________________________________ > From: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net> > Sent: 20 March 2020 21:39 > To: Simon Rowe > Cc: buildroot at busybox.net > Subject: Re: [Buildroot] Error building Python with musl in 2020.02 > > Hello Simon, > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:12:07 +0000, Simon Rowe <Simon.Rowe@citrix.com> wrote: > > > I'm getting the following error when trying out 2020.02 with the latest musl-based toolchain > > > > > > /build/host/bin/x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl-gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os -std=c99 -Wextra -Wno-unused-result -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -I./Include/internal -I. -I./Include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fPIC -DPy_BUILD_CORE_BUILTIN -c ./Modules/xxsubtype.c -o Modules/xxsubtype.o > > ./Modules/posixmodule.c: In function 'os_copy_file_range_impl': > > ./Modules/posixmodule.c:9704:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_file_range'; did you mean 'sync_file_range'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > 9704 | ret = copy_file_range(src, p_offset_src, dst, p_offset_dst, count, flags); > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > | sync_file_range > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > Makefile:1938: recipe for target 'Modules/posixmodule.o' failed > > > > > > Has anyone else seen this? > > Python or python3? Could you provide a .config or defconfig file > for the failure? > > Regards, > Peter > > > > > > > Simon > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1585215897497.45733@citrix.com>]
* [Buildroot] Error building Python with musl in 2020.02 [not found] ` <1585215897497.45733@citrix.com> @ 2020-03-26 15:50 ` Peter Seiderer 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Peter Seiderer @ 2020-03-26 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello Simon, re-add CC: buildroot at busybox.net On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:44:57 +0000, Simon Rowe <Simon.Rowe@citrix.com> wrote: > Thanks for looking at this Peter, I did a cleanup of my work directory and a rebuild worked. Must have has some stale junk, sorry for the noise, That's good news ;-), thanks for the feedback... Regards, Peter > > Simon > ________________________________________ > From: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net> > Sent: 23 March 2020 17:42 > To: Simon Rowe > Cc: buildroot at busybox.net > Subject: Re: [Buildroot] Error building Python with musl in 2020.02 > > Hello Simon, > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:33:21 +0000, Simon Rowe <Simon.Rowe@citrix.com> wrote: > > > [Apologies for the top posting, stuck with web-based email] > > > > python3, defconfig attached. This config has been working with 2019.02, I loaded and re-saved it > > Given defconfig still compiles fine here.... > > - ./build/python3-3.8.2/Modules/posixmodule.c: > The usage of copy_file_range() is protected by HAVE_COPY_FILE_RANGE > > - HAVE_COPY_FILE_RANGE is defined in pyconfig.h: > $ grep HAVE_COPY_FILE_RANGE build/python3-3.8.2/pyconfig.h > #define HAVE_COPY_FILE_RANGE 1 > > - the buildroot compiled musl libc proviedes copy_file_range: > > $ nm -A host/x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl/sysroot/lib/libc.so | grep copy_file_range > host/x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl/sysroot/lib/libc.so:000000000001f4bd T copy_file_range > > - the header file provides copy_file_range() (protected by _GNU_SOURCE) > > $ grep copy_file_range host/x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl/sysroot/usr/include/unistd.h > ssize_t copy_file_range(int, off_t *, int, off_t *, size_t, unsigned); > > Please try a plain defconfig (without EXTERNALs), make sure no additional patches/config files > are used.....otherwise out of ideas... > > Regards, > Peter ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-26 15:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-20 15:12 [Buildroot] Error building Python with musl in 2020.02 Simon Rowe
2020-03-20 21:39 ` Peter Seiderer
2020-03-23 9:33 ` Simon Rowe
2020-03-23 17:42 ` Peter Seiderer
[not found] ` <1585215897497.45733@citrix.com>
2020-03-26 15:50 ` Peter Seiderer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox